High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri M Jayaram vs K P T C L on 26 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri M Jayaram vs K P T C L on 26 June, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS mg 26*' DAY cm JUNE 2o99f 
BEFORE "    

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE AJIT J G?"/1N\,1Zf"";;*'~:QV   '

WRIT PETITION Nos.15858-15859 01? gbéféfr-}1'_I'j«' 

BETWEEN

3

SR1 M JAYARAM
S/O V.MUNiSWAMY      
R/AT No.41, 'D' BLOCK, TUNGA COMPLEX, f:
POLICE QUARTERS, KOR£sivTAfi€}A'LA '  
BANGLAORE 560 Q34 5 1    
PRGP: SR1 VINAYAKA EN*rE1;a.P:;21sEv$;..VV  .
SR1 M KRISHNA  " 1 ., "
S/0 1\au§%z;L..I MANoHa.R~'MATMAR.:,_
A<:e._:D4.A£30t?t' .4:s.v'1;:A:?_s  7- .

:R"j)3L*:"re.{ifi..4,  Rfifib;

'65'1'H_ CROSS~;..S}EIV£1.NAf3AR- BANGALORE 10,
PRO? M fS VENIAL !3;L1-':(:*}?1e1cA.Ls.
.. ,   -- _  ' ...f'E'FI'I'IONERS

{By ffiri T.RS.UBB'ANNA ,"SRACOUNSEL F09 Smt : B V

  W?

V  CAUVEFEY BHAVAN,

 _ VE£:'!3}I45;THA MIS s;f_s.(_5N 85 SW}

K?ic£V

B_A1§'G:=iLORE 9,

" .RELE.BY ITS MANAGING WRECTOR,

f5fI\¥ANCIAL ADVISOR {A am)

 KPTCL, CORPORATE OFFICE '}"F'H FLOOR'

CAVUERY BHfi.VAN, BANGALORE 9.

EXECUT'iVE ENGENEEER ELECTRICAL
TL. AND SS I)i'v'ISION,

KPIYEL 22$ KV STATION, COMPQUNI),
KDLAR 363 301.

EXECUTIVE ENGENEER
TL 85 SS DEVISEGN,
E<iP"£'CL, SOMANAHALLI BANGALORE RURAL



5 EXECUTIVE ENGNIEER
TL 35 SS DEVISION,
KPTCL PEENYA, BANGALORE.

6 UNIION OF 1ND1A,

REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIQRER

OF ENCOME TAX {TESL CENTRAL " ._

REVENUE EUILUING, QU§}EN'$ RC}A§)~; .. . "  if '
BANGALORE-560 O01.    RE-SPOl'v§DE:_NTS" ~.

{Amended vide order' dated 16.6.2069)

{By Sri H.V.DEVARAJ, Ami. F0R.1s'§<;..m' '13; c;uPA'rA,,_A;3?v. FOR
R1-S; SR1 M.V.SESHACH_ALA, SR. s'r~A:§:3:1~:.Q COUNSEL FOR R6)

THESE WPS FILED'VL1'14eLi1«3I€é.1:.&1f:1§c:1f;Es§ 226 AND 227 OF'
THE CONSTETUTIQN 01+" 1.zs:;::iAV.P12A¥v1NG'T0"QUASH THE LETTER
1::r1:2s.4Ko9, xssugu BY frag: 3)., ATA_:--'JN~C;':*i"O THE WP.

These"   gmelirninaly hearing in
'B' Group thi$_r§§3y, flat: 'C"o1;ft'II1a.;1e the following:

 y%j;§3..§.E R.
'I'?'t'16~:L p~::ti'1:i<3érV:."<4:~'1*':~"; writ petitions are C1ass--I

Ellegtficai Cio11f.f_fa{§to§5':; for arranging the shift duties and

VA mifzosr s'111z9.i1itg:;:1az1ce werks in several of thte sub~stat;ions.

   that till the year 2001 thf: rate of tax

dé{i11CE€§{:1"é{t source was only 2.26% from the 131315 0f

  cenkaétors far irxcome tax purpose under Section 1940

 {he Income Tax. It appears, the respondent

Wilorporation has all of a sudden on 25.04.2009 started

deducting 10.3()% towards tax from April 2008 to

February 2009. It appears, tha said éttduction is an thew

(2) The assessing officer shall consider-~.___ the

application at the earliest. Till the

are considered and an order is

respondents shall dedu-.€:fOf11y_ ‘i’D:S.

Petitions disposed of acc0rcii1’;§i’§/f_.x