uuuxl Ur mmnmxa HIGH count-or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA. HIGH couar or KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH com:
153 ms HIE-“H CGLIRT my imnrmmm AT
wrcrzn THIS was 12″ may or JUNE,
EEFORE ‘ 2.’ ‘
wax H’C!tIE’BLE :nn..ms’rIcz
cmtxlum FETITIGNA §3§3;’5V¢§/2E3£If§’_A.A’A'” * ”
EETWEEH ‘K ” Rvw
1 an: M rum @ s3’0t:_”rz .§”32’+2s:”nLi–,_
sin MUHIYAPPA
mm anon? 3’1
RJAT :3’r__::Rcss,.. ..r,9E:a.n’ = ”
TEMPLE, .aummmA1§,.: 9313363.
2 321 5:52′ 3€L1REJGEsH«.._
310′:-;u§:1$:wAx’?– _ ‘_
,P..e’.n:r’ 1 $3? CROS3,’w.b_}E;RR .M;n.n1YmmA
‘=:_*m»$?i-**L:..13’:.. ‘ ‘
as-zxnrsea. V . .. PETITIGHERS
{av 33-21: in mmm:%mm Rm 5. M smmaa, Amrs}
‘ §?:”.tv.r€:.:%. ‘5’*:t*. nonmrsw P 2
“:=:r§fr;_ n§*.$’rA’rE PUBLIC PROSECUTBR,
‘§*3IS’E’! j_C£3R£JT {JP X}-‘iRNP:TPdCP:,
I I I
<9? s7§"»::é H 1: sznnmmenzm, 'HCGP ;;
V" 'THIS CR&.F I3 Flhfifi U!S.439 CR.P.C BY' THE
V Kw._£§VfiflhTE FQR THE PETITIOKER PRAYING THEE THEE
Hfifi'ELE QQURT MAY BE PLEASEB TO RELEASE THE
PETITIfiHER 03 RAIL ifi CR.fi0.33fG7 OF DODDAEET
5%"
..’UUK! Ur KAKNAIAKA I-iiurl-i t.’UUK’lA’Aulr’t KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUIT
?.s., saxmaua. WHICH IS nzsxgwsnan roa HrxE
0353333 Pffifs. 504, 323, 324, 392 Riv 34m1?§;fz ux
THIS gazwzon CGIHG on FOR oRpg§3,rH:si§AY{_ *
THE SBBRT MAEE THE I”G{:LOk’I!’3G;–“””
o 3.2′ 3*.’
‘Elm patitioners féfig of
bail in <:z§§_–:’_5Q§:, ‘-Z§.23,;Vf3é£i;W;302 x:/w Sec 34
2. Pe.z:§<:::g::;3.i,ri§.* ii§;S "tiB'._a4pro5ecnti<an, can 3-3–200?
2.35 these two pertitionerra aiong
t§-a"i.§}1_ vA:§A..TT:1A.t.';'»'f:E §fE.!".':_'.!? brczxther and their nmthezzz went
n.§ <a;: ri§gSfi.se car the complainant and piaked
my c;w:t;=-gazrrél in connection with mpayment of
<':1ralsh_*;. s The pestzitiarmra along with anthers
'"e;#?aéz2,3.ted csne Kfrzundan what» is the hxothez-in-
of the -::at@1ai:n.ant,, meanwhile, Kalavathi
the wife cf the complainant and the
emrtplainaxzt intervened. Enraged by the
WV
COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA RIG!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (IOU?!
intervention, the patitionars assaulteflrithe
daaeaaed with a Etene an her head, a§Wa ;§EfiIt
at which, aha fall uncanscious aad sufi§um§éfi,'"
ta imjuxiaa an 16-3-200?.:L
3. Heard the learngafi’ ¢oufi$a@”5 fpr the
yetitianera anfi }th$ i laa#ned Gcvernent
Piaader.
4. It J of the learned
coun§el_f5§;t§@_§§fiitionera that altheugh the
camplaint_w3a fil§d]&§ain3t fcux persona, two
af than a%e_;eftxnuf. It is to be ascertained
“&$ fa fih§x§ctu$i$y aasaultad the deceased. It
~§s &£#é,§u§mittad that there is ne yrima facie
cage fie: mativa far aammission of the offence
wJ’anfi initially; the ca3a was registered for the
‘*§ffénce under Samtian 324 cf IPC, accordingly,
.i”~~$ought far grant cf bail.
./
IX”
..uuK: ur :\AKNA:AnA mun L.’UuxI t.n: KARNAIAISA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-‘IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR7
5, The laaxned Gar-zernment Elaadm: .::ve;&i;iE::fI:eci
the petiticsn.
6. it is seen that the pigi:.i.:t:fi,’§:§:x1é2T,zr%._’a:§saz;ii:.£3r§L
the decreased with a stage a:aé:’:._}’:”x”»2a:: ha &-;1, 4 :1u:§3
thfl injuries su2ste3.inad..u “~.:;fir. h~aVV f éi3;Q_VV:1:V§nc}5;xxsropriata: to
camaixziezc far grant
afi bail. ” fzresa for early
trial; 1 Acczzmrdingly, the
y 2-tit izszi’ ;i,_s§ Vdis;$é::«é{é:5:,4 ”
Sd/-3′
Iudgg