-;-
EN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DA'I'ED THIS THE am my 0? JUM:
BEFORE _ ' '
THE H€}N'BLE MR.JUS'I"ICE SL§BH§.$¥i_:§,VA:§§:1 3
CRIEHHAL PET1T:onr'.i;o;§g.0;,3g:2bG9 ' * '
BETWEEN: ' ~ "
SRE.M.S.A KUMAR
MANAGENG DIRECTOR
M/S aw NATURAL PRO_DUCT'S_LTI;~._
VAZHA.KULAM . ' ' _
MARAMPILLY POST . . ._ ; .+
ALUVA ~ 68310'? V t EETITIONER
(By sm.JA¥Av:Tr2$L-.RA£j, ghv. "
CRESTLAW 4PAm;;3zE:_i~2s,' .A£)'§JS)
é.IF_I_3. :
STATE cm I_<;;ARN-A'PAI<{A -- -
REP BY 'A.sss1sJ:*ANT:.13.1RE:s:f:*;'.§2 0:2' F'AC'1"'ORiES
TUMKLJR §Z)..EVES£0'E'~I {AN §NS§>§::£:*§'o§< m3P<::s1m'ED
UNDER SEC'"iT}€)'?J 8(1) iC?F"FHE'
F'AC1'i'{;}5RE£3S ACT,' 1948 '
" - ,s*1*.%;:r%;:2§fffs $<:Ho"CsL....,re_-..c)As, <;}ANDHiNAGflsR
V 'im,m;UR 9 5723102 RE"iS?ONDE§N'1'
~.g:é;g,T:_T-,é:f;.go§f;3j$:;'§i¢é;:%1$tA, HCGP}
C§RL.P FILED U[S..482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVGCKTE
P'E3'I'§TiONER PRAYING THAT THES PEQPFBLE CQURT
"Is/14:":Y_ SE ?LEASE¥3 TC} SET' ASIDE THE ORDER DATES 33.5.2088
PASSED BY TEE {SJ IJRDN) ANY} JMFQ, 'TiPT'UR IN Ci: NC}.
" _ 4132/2008 ANI} QUEKSH THE COMPLAINT.
THIS PE"¥'E'"§'I€}N C€}1it§£NG QN FUR AQMISSIGE TIFHS DAEC
" '§'HE COURT' MASH: THE FOLLOWENG:
'}
L-
ORDER
Petitimzler has sought for q_uash;Eng of the {3r:’X:€::~:di11gs in
C’L.{1_No.4-1A2/ 2098 011 ‘(ha fiie 0fJ.M.F’.C., ‘T’ip£1.13;*.
2. iflampiaim; is under the p1″DViSi€)I1S csf Seciion i?;1)’»T{)f the
Factozies ACE, 1948 (‘AC6 for Shfifl). It is alleged tizaé,’
empioyaes suffemd 1′::1ju1″y 011 account cf ‘2:;zVt”
C¢.’)I1\!f3§?0I’, which was in metion a11€i;vé§”?$;jjee<;vl "Qf 7.
8C3 RPM and due ':0 {£161 envelopmeni .:b§£3I1.;:L
af 1:116 aonveyor, his sufikzmd
when he scrrzamed f{x.:".._ 3C1e1}_::«,""' "the: screaming,
employees, who were wo:rk*_§;:1g" linxmeéiatfiiy azui
switchetifoflf __am1 fretci his énveiopcd right hand
by rotating Vt_h €:.<:o':1"z..r<2V§z"-:§ 2*.
i\?'oiic§11g"i"31$ Saki i:'::,<;:i:is::1t, that authozities an izmpectioxz
f:§1m_a:i' :§;§§'tA¢.:},1}5;«-..a::mpioyer has 1:101: previaiad atiequatfi aaiéty, and
pmvisivzms; of Smtiml 21 0f the Asst, in this
_ regazfii, c<.;'m§.ié.int has been fiied unézier 866333011 92 of the Rift.
V' * "8ri.Jayav:itta1 Rae E{‘i’1’c€_, sought for §,”ifi3{‘IIkiSSi{)I1 {ram the
4. ‘g
C §f’§,,,…-M
g./3, a
highrszr auihoxzéty to prosecutfi the §et,it:i<):{1er and in the said letter,
it is m€11§'ithem;fise _:Lh锑~:;:;::»mp1éiiu€ ii): its £:11i;ire’£y,
if it is read, it {ices moi: Iiifiiie’ (:1-“::t,f’za§ p1%i1%1c£.’féem7e Case §}uI1iShEibk”:
undel’ Sectien of that, fl}€I’€ is no
allegation as if: ‘Vi§I_ai§Qn.,,cff«’§;gcfion 21 of the Act. Even
the a]1c}sgé:iiTo1:siif,ma{:i§V’it1:”‘flit: they :10 not make out
such caésec, ” V
3. C»r::’fi;p}ai1:1§ “that, an acc3;s:ie11t GCCl1I’1″‘€d in the
‘V * atfliiert one’p’¢iE-an was injumé. The authozity cm noticing
–$1jxr:vv.V4éi:§v};Z§§y:ir has not cozziplied with the requirameniz of
pmviséisné ¢”if”j”t.’:t_$;’:3V Act, am} vieiation has resuitgd in an acc:id.ent.
j N€:ce5§$s3;:;§a safety measures; at not takfin. Ailztgafien in the
i c<:¥mp}.ai11Vi prfmzz fix-fie Shaw the afianae alleged. At this stage,
— used net look into fhfi evidence emé give fi:r<i§Zng. if the
" 't:'s:§m1c+1ai11t shewa that {he aflegations fie make prsirna fazie case,
x then it is 1101:. 2: Cass for quashizig. This C3331': has to he sélcsw in
é 1
. gg
2"'
qzzashing the proceadings. in tha cimumstancas, I dQ__11-:2: find
any gr01.md ta intetrfezce with the proceedings.
Act:-tjxrdixlgiy, the petition fails and sa1n¢.Vi3s'v_§:x7–is1t§§i§f3'3:c:_d. 3
am}
Iuags
KNM/"'