High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri M S K Iyengar vs Sri Ramanath B on 28 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri M S K Iyengar vs Sri Ramanath B on 28 August, 2008
Author: S.R.Bannurmath & Gowda
IN THE men CGURT or-" KARNATAKA AT BAN$A_1_f0i§;E 

DATED THIS THE 23"' DAY cw AUGUST;"..':x\E09§VV'    "

PREsEwT~.j

THE HOWBLE MR.3USTiCE £'$'.a.7sA§mus§t4AT§é 

 A. "  « '
THE i-£ON'BLE MR. JUSTIC -.§£;!S3.VENU.GC)E§fi.vLA'«~§5€}\NE}A

 

wan APPEAL NQ-.§881;2~_Q07§. i_"R}  

BETWEEN:

SR1 M s K IYENGAR  _  '
s/0 SUi)ARSH.Ai\3ACHAE;

AGED AaouT:_37 'ms  . 
R,/AT LEELA'u'A'EHi~..EXTEP4$IG§j _
MADDUR, I'-1_AN_D'irf§YA 'iaisiyj \  

 '''' 'V     AP¥7'i':'LLANT
(BY M/s.._ 'S RAEU-«vamssgciaffis, ADVS.)

AND I

1 " SR1 RAMANATH B
, S'/O SWAMKANATH
iAs'5E£: ABOUT35 YEARS,
_, KIA?' re«::.Q-68 UPSTAIR
' . _'1..s"r Malia: ROAD,
'SFg{RAh§'¥'URAM ISANGALORE 21

...m:~¥:'.Au0 "TRIBUNAL
» gap. av ITS SECRETARY
'=33sNEKAL BANGALORE msr

'  3:21. B.S.3ANAi(1RAMAN,

s/0 SRINIVAS IYENGAR,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

R/AT HOUSE N022, RHS QUARTERS,
5*" BLOCK, PAIAJINAGAR,
BANGALORE 10.



SR1 B.S.SA'i"fiYANAN-DAN,
szo SRINIVAS IYENGAR, muoa,

R/AT M0534, 32"" CROSS,

IN VIEW OF THE BLOCK,   
JAYANAGAR, 
BANGAi,ORE-11.

SR1 B.s.s£:sa-mun:  --. "
s/0 SRMVAS IYEMEAR, : 
mm ABOUT 75 YEARS, --. '-

RIAT No.68, UPSTAIRS," ,

15" mm ROAD,  , 
MARUTHI E}a"?Efii3iO=§i, , _
sR1RAMPu--szAr:%;'"  . ' 
3Am3Lr:~.or::;-:0UT 29 YEARS,

R/AT N9. 135, SATHYANARAYANA LAYOUT,

WEST OFCHORD ROAEJ,

,raAHALAKsHM_1PuRAiw LAYOUT POST,

 ..... .. '\

 " smi, 'RAMAMANI. B.

  AGES"-.AB{3UTv*'38 YEARS,
 av'/0 LATE LEWARKANATH,

*-..,R/AT %«IO,;lQ as UPSTAIRS,

15?' MAIN RGAD,
MARUTHI EXTEESION,

 ~ :,SRI?J\MPURAM,
 E5ANGALORE--21.

sm. GODAMANI,
w/0 T.A.MURALI,

AGES A3OUT 41 YEARS,

R/AT No.52, 39*' moss,

BAHASHANKARI II STAGE,

BAHGALORE.

4 TO 8 ARE REPR.ESEN3E{). av IFS (§,P.A.H{)LDER
SRI. JANAKIRAM,



9 SR1 A.C. SRJNIVASARAJU,
S/O A.M. CHANDRASHEKARA RMU  
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, "

R/AT N0.172/1. sRIN1vAsAmaus1iR:AL   .   

BANNARGHATTA ROAD, 
BANGLAO RE ?6. 

10 SR1 M. NAGARAJ,   * 
s/0 LATE MUNIANIINAPPA@__VNA1\:3APPAf   * 
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,  *  

R/AT No.2, 100 FEETRING R.rw;;,__ 
BTM LAYOUT 15*' STAGE "  V 
BANC-3AL0RE~29.  A _  _  AA ,
"5P°§B"T3. 3 '~1'°.~'--°. _  '--- A  P.ESP{;3N'DENTS
ARE BREED.' vxmconas.' ORDER DATED 27.2.03,
(av SR1: KRISHl€_EG1}W_DAFOR_R1, _  " 
SR1. KM.;NATAVR;33;_VF0RV*R3';~.V   
SR1. peat "(taming on for admission, this day, A.N.

% ._\}Em;G0PA;..A'epwoA, 1., delivered the fl!ow%ng:~

.3'-'f3'C5.E'1;h_E_.»i§!,"_if

 .. _Ap:.paé:§ant was respondent No.10 in W.P. No.

20565,Ié9. Respondents 1 to 8 herein had meet the said

j’ w.r§.t§ petition. The writ petition was aiiowed by the teamed

“Single Judge on 29.1.2007 setting aside the impugned

“xiv ,~rs”’:y. ) 5. .,

f’
C)

the appeliant and the proposed respondents, by an order

dated 6.8.08, IA. IV was answer: and the purchasers w’ére

ordered to be brought on record as respondents 9

3. r We have heard the iearned__ co1rri§ei.:ffor””Vtr_seV

appeilarrt and the respondents and pérusfdd if

4. Sri.C.B. Srinivasanr iedrrzed garage;
for the appeliant submrm-rd th’ét,’:nrjioé-a..i’mpdohéd”order
passed by the iearned Sinoid to operate,
by directing the\§Lér1: d:-vv’ourchasers of
the iand in S31; Viilage and proceed
for adjtidi’ca’tio;rj;r’.’ ” é I”hto; consideration the
obsewafions”rna£3oV Singre Judge and to
dispose or tho’c§aIm; irro:;o6rriance with raw.

__”‘Ti1ue Ioar”ned___counsei for respondents No.9 and

i;,e;,VVth e’.puArth.asers of the property in Sy. No.47 of
Laksrrirpraro ‘{is»;sa}¢;-Q submitted that respondents 9 and 19

win ap;ioxarv.ébéfore the Land Tribunai and put frYh their