High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Manjunath @ Ananda vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 8 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Manjunath @ Ananda vs United India Insurance Co Ltd on 8 June, 2009
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
in: ma man comm' op KARNATAKA AT BANGAL§Z?€R_'E..
DATED THES THE 3TH DAY 0;: JUNE 2oQ9_%"A   
BEFORE   4, :1 1'  _   ' 4_
'THE HONBLE MR. JUS'I'¥CE A.N.vgNuGopALA'j:jG¢*AraA  " " A ''

M.F.A.No.:21421g;§o6  4- .

 

BETWEEN :

SRI.MANJUNA'I'i-I @ ANANDA   '

s/0 HANUMANTHAIAH

AGED 18 YEARS A  

R/AT THUNDENA HALL).  % 

BANAVARA HOBLI,  A

ARASIKERE 'rALu;;,     é A

HASSAN D1s'rR:_cf.1j.   j   ;; APPELLANT

(BY sRI.saR:.:=AAD.§_v:§.. .s:;{AS;?.1§I;~. .A13¥V.1)j  *

AND:  """    1'. <. . .. ~.

1. UNITED~.iNDfA=§§:$'§U1§A:§f_CE'CO. L'I'D.,

D.O.Vf, CHITFAPi,iR.BH@'_¥»'A'N,
15%: cnoss, ivam _MAIr~:, 
MALLESHWARAM, A '

V B£.:NGAJ.ORE?55, _
" '~  _ mi .;\aA1_~:Ac3ER"; AAAA "

 AINFALAKSHMI 31.,
 R-,'I_AT'1'm;3 1,. CROSS,
WCR, J.C.{§'AGAR,
BANGALORE-86.  RESPGNDENTS

% " " 5 (§3R!¢S.SH'RiSHILA, ADV. FOR 2.. 1)

_ __  715313 M.F'.A. £S FILEIT) UNDER SECYFION 173(1) GFMV
T ~, A'C'I' AGAINST ma: JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATEE



 

'?.3.20{)6 PASSED mac NO4494/2003 on TI1,E:%' eé*:L;r:'»%«.§3}-;_
X1: ADDL. JUDGE, MEMBER, mar, comm-' " 4_
CAUSES, METROPOLITAN AREA, BANGA!,G{-IE:=.{S'¢C'H~8)# '*~ 2
PARTLY ALLOWHJG THE % <:eLAi1§(t'*  I'+'«E'I'iI'AI'I.«'£i)ExE.VVw._; P4Q'l§:'
COMPENSATION AND SEEKINCIX eNHA5:e%mm:T

COMPENSATION.

TPIIS M.F.A. cemzge ONF{§§?VVV"f§E{ARINC}"I'HIS mar,
THE comm' DELIVEREI) 1"'e.3e§eL;;ew}H G: _

The    égifh an accident on
account   driving of the vehicle
by its  by the second respondent

and insured’ the responfient. The claim

‘~ filed zby {1’:e”‘a}§peHant has been allowed in part

Vawé1’d§ng.4:_e§eH;;§e§1sation of Rs.56,0{)O/– under different

he.a1<i$;%é with the amount awarded, claiming

"the eonlkp-ensatien as prayed in the petition i.e.,

/ «, this apmal has been preferred.

*9»

2. 1 have heard Srishripad V.

counsel for the appellant and Sri. ..

counsel for the respondent –

perused the records.

3.Considering natnxireu inj f;.13:’§e’S’,’
has awarded the heads.

The nature of_:’iI;juI’.f.eS”:’ the appellant
refleeted 5,k1;.a§+¢ duly taken into
conside_m.t.io_fi.. quantum of loss by
the enhancement of any of the

amozmt, ofhei’ the head pain and suffering

, mvaéev Cofisidezfiizg the fact that the appeliant has

“ebeexi .VsVu_f.fe’;fi11.g'””from pain and discomfort for some time

dtfiaxtn’ the I deem it just to award a further

‘ ‘sum ef R;$..5,.{)”{}(}/~ under the head pain and suffering.

V’ In the result, the appeal is aliewed in part.

’11’ ‘Ad.(§j,ti0fla} compensafien of Rs.5,000/~ is awarded

:=§:rI1ieh shall carry interest at 6% per ammm from the

E

/’.,

date of filing of claim petition til}

respondent – insurance company shail _

amount within a period of three fi3l0fifi1$ fr01fn*t§>{ia§{.”‘

costs. Registry to draw up éLward.T A”

RS/*

AI ..,._J.__.»