IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARIIATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 21'") DAY OF JULY, 2009
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B..-f{DIV " A'
CRIMINAL PETITION No.57s/A20¥3"9"VV'<' %
BETWEEN: V V ' V
SR1 MANJUNATH @ MANJU
S/O RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
NO. 10/64, 64TH CROSS, V
5?}; MAIBLOPPOSITE NHK
KALYAN MANTAPA,
PATTEGARPALYA,
BANGALORE.
.. PETITIONER
fig: V """ H ._ '_
STATE BY'1%*nJaYA:§.éLa:;§.-1%: ' "
= 2 '-- _ .. RESPONDENT
-V _:{By_$ri.$ATi~*$uH R GIRJI, HCGP)
' C"=z*}§£1LE9 U/S439 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR
THE 'I~*1s;f1'1T:<51j§.E_1a*.":;'§*1éAY1rqG THAT THIS HONBLE coum' MAY BE
PLEASED 'I'O _§;MLARGE THE PETR. ON BAIL IN S.C.NO.831/08
'PENDING. mg THE FILE OF THE PAST TRACK SESSIONS JUDGE,
'~ B§;Ir€QALORE. (FTC-'7}, (CRNOJ75/O8 09' VIJAYANAGARA R8,}
' REGB. FOR THE OFFENCE P/UfS.302 R12 34 OF IPC.
THES PETFFION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS BAY, THE
' '~ LVCOURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Petitioner is seeking enlargement on bail in
No.175/2008 registered by Vijayanagar police, ‘”031
24.3.2008 for an ofience punishable under
ofIPC.
2. Complainant alleges Vthat et= Aetaout
24.3.2008, he and his nephew
Palya near Bhattara Hote1.;::4i-éoweivhetj, ‘event with
Lokesh his friend and the complainant
that, he would back. When the
complainant in a hotel, they heard
the hie’oe.’;Immediately, he rushed
outside ‘Shaw herein and others were
rtmning withttthlood eiothes and /he immediately went to the
‘t ” ‘ V eei 43/
. eegg’ . . ..
that ‘h:..s.._.«’ was lying with bieedmg mjmies,
V”howev’c.r,j he to the injuries.
for the petifioner submits that, even
aecoxflihg the complainant he only says that the petitioner
w=%e..€: with other accused. He has not emu the incident
ihtther submits that, the petitioner has been in judicial
‘ A» V 30111 March 2608 and against the petitioner, no other
exime is registered or involved in any other crime. gag
J K’
4. {lonsidexing the circumstances. on certain stringent
conditions, petitioner couhil be enlarged on 1381}.
S. Aocordiflgly. the petition is allowed. The
enlarged on bail subject to following conditions: ‘ M V L” %
a) The petitioner shail execute _Vf;jr’:”
Rs.50.00{)/– with one __ for_
Iikesum amount to the .-iaiigfacfionxof
b) The petitioner tamper ” ~ with,’ the
prosecution wimeeses or the evidence;
c) The petitieller new; the Court
(1) {s”hé”peéii:ip:1;é%;§ ‘ sag;-a1Jjeemar*;;e hie attendance once in
cieys police between 10.00
am; and on Sunday.
A 13;; vithe eveiit ef-any other crime committed by the
» or any violation of bail condition.
_ M prdaecafitieh is at liberty to seek cancellation of
X % baa; ~
Sd/-‘L
Judge
*AP/ –