High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue … on 24 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Mariyanna vs The State Of Karnataka Revenue … on 24 June, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIE-I COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  ~..

omen mxs THE 24"' my OF :mE,gooe%%% '  T ' 

BEFORE)

me HON'8LE MRJUSTICE.MQHAAN._SHANTV.%'i%3fi§$§§U§;)J2  * %

ws2;g;T PETITION No.3 g44%k{:_;--;2oc7*m,I2~s2:2+§uR)

3E'1'WEEN:

Mariyarma.               
S/0 late Méulijsgizxtappa '  '
Aggd 73V'yj:ai_$  .. ..

R] a N6. 10 1§.1.,VT5Nes¥ ':Extci1:3ion _

 P9521 7 Téziegrzaph. _Q':3.a1"tcrs

Hanging Boalti-Rtiaidg Na-gar Fest

Kava}bym5an.dr£i,-- B£:1§igaIi::{e~32. ..Petitioner

(By gsri E. i{f.isimV;;:p§a,v'Adv.,}

:4:--u----.-----.

1 L' '-  ;« I '   . Karxlataka

" . 'I§cvcnu4:f_D-itpaxtmcnt
 S5 '!3'uj}(1i11g, Bangalore-G 1
Rap by its Principal Secretary.

 The fahsfldm
 Bangalore East Taiuk
KR. Pumm, Bangalore.

  :3. The Deputy Tahsildar

Nada Kachetti, Bidamhalii



Bangaiore East Taluk.

4. The Assistant Clommifissiuiuer
Bangaiore North Sub-Diviaitm
Bangalore.

5. Byrangna
S] 0 late Munikuntappa
Aged 68 years
R/a NLM. Layout  
Ambedkar Medical College  
Main Road, Kava1by1"asa11dra_*.._ V
R31'. Nagar Post, IE§auixg_alc::fiAe--32.L*- _

6. Smt. Poomima N.   1 ,
W/o KAI. Naiayanaswanjny '- 
Aged 53 T g g   " '
R/a No.4i?f7.2, fix'??? Cross _  V- V
SaéasI1ivariaVgéar,.._Ba31g§a1£;r(:;V_   _ ..Rcspondents

{By Sri satyanaréyaszia "{{§r'R1 to R4)

This writ petition is fi1e_da.1'nd§:i" Articles 226 and 227 of
the Constitutifm Qf India,' prayirig to direcct the R2 and R3 to
compigfi Wifitfi, the order"  by the R4- Assistant
Coiiimissiofiér,  North Sub--{}ivision_, Baxzgaiore
Vida c:L11_;1c:1";{'1':ia':3fi*'3_ hy'<:hév  Authority in R.A.No.299[*2002--
03 dated 5.510:-2Qo4"and_i..in R.A.No.44'2] 2006-07 dated 28-

1j1;L«-2005 'which  fzmarkcd as Anncxures-F and .1
'r§:xspeCfively.».."_  A

 ' "  This WIit"p§-fition ceming ml for preiiminary heating in
 I3fQ'}L"'t1'1:3..i';1§,  day the Court; made the foIIowing:~

ORDER

5

‘T V . _ :The:g,riz€:vaI1cc of the petitioner is that the (Z3I’d{-:I”‘S

by the Assistant Comlmssiener, Vida

rx/5

,3.

AI]Il€X11E’€:S’-F and J, dated 5.10.2904

respectively, are not Compliecl with by ..

on this day.

2. The records {hat

Commissioner, B.mj;galQre” ‘ A’ A ‘ Suhifiivisian,
Bangaiore, by his oygciér’ directeci the
Tahsiidar ‘L0; notice 1:9 all the
COI1{:€}.'”I”1f§€=3.. ‘vthe Tahsiltiar has not
attgtortiance with the ordar
of Subsvfiiiuentlfi’. by the

c2rd¢_r_ datészi V28′, 1200-63, the Assistant Commis.3io11er

v _ fiEé””‘Téhsfldar to obey the earlier cmtier

Even then, the Tahsiidar has; slept

fiaéitter. The irlaction an the part of the

Tahsiifiér is deprecated. The order of the Assistant

hCiG_§missi0ner dated 5.10.2004 is not questiened by

% ” The Tahsfldar being the irlferior Ofiicer to the

Assistant Ciemmissicaner is duty bcund in obtity the

it/’

.4.

ordars csf thé Assistant Commissioner. He sléep

over the matter. if such action is cQ:3ij;1u€t_i’~ Ztha ‘

Tahsilfiar, than this Court mzéy éifiziiiiéfs. T

the Tahsildar. Accordingly, foflQ1§éin_ g ‘ “orC1é§i*~ *’

3:I1ade:- n 2 ‘ V

The secand to:

comply with the passed by the
4″‘ V ‘ ‘ Ctsinmissioner, as
later than the outer
Iimiftof. ” the date of receipt of this
0rder. ‘ 4’ ‘V

.. ‘V Writ disposed of accardiilgly.

, Sd/-9
Judge

A A.V’;C§I§:]bsx1-