High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Maruthi Yuvaka Sangha vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Maruthi Yuvaka Sangha vs The Deputy Commissioner on 13 April, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil

wwvouvva

i
§
3
S
E
2
3
§
%
Q
§
3
$
9
x
Q
3
E
E
2
M
§
%
§
§
3
Q
9
3
Q
3
§
§
i
E
$
§
L
3
§
3
3
J
§
§
:

§
§
x
3
§
§
%
3
E

3. ._
3 ~._
§
§
§
§
5
§
S
i
3
;

1% THE Hififi Cfififi? Q? §ARfiA?AE& £T EE§Qfi%®RE,

aawa: {E-I»-izy “§’E–€E 33% may <:::§* MR1; Eizagk '

: &$?Q§E 5

THE fi$fi'ELE fiRhJU$TI$$ £;K}§%?I;.

xi? PE?E?EfiN’RQ.9%i6 SF 2$§é_§3§(~ ?§§§,:”1′ T

B$T¥EEK:

SRZ.fiARU?HE Y¥¥hK§ 3§xagA_gaE@é;3;’ “,
saakxahaaaz ¥E;§&GE, ‘ ‘. :’v”-V
SRL&flfiME HQELI, , L.=:
xassax ?A&3K ANS §:s?R3c?,,_a

5? z?s SECRS?AR¥,._- ; V :_4-., Z
33: gavzsx 3.3.3. }s=V.’\ 7 V _’a'”””W”

{%y-§§;E;¥;§§E¥$§fi§,¢%fi?$£ATEE

aww:

3. THE sa§w?Va:$Mg::5é$§§é}g§Q&m},
fia33A§_§:3T§£cT,V§. x_'<
V HASSEEEVL. '.

ék TEE ¥g?g?% §:§§c?$R fl?
“FQ$3 %§$¢CI§$§ 3§§?$EE3,
aas$aa«szs$g::$;

Agsax.

7_3.L?Ha céagigsiswaa gag F®%§ &
‘”u””,C§?EL ggggaxas,

v%%§KE?E§S F$§ERfi?§$§ %§E¥§E%§¢

Av fifigfig fifififiixfifififi RGAQ,

–. f_8A§**:i$»§.§};2RE – 5&2 €252′
E ., §ES§$§§$§T3

gay %£a§.Ea¥E8fi¥A§fiTH, agag

fifififli

afi xéapanéenta 1 ta 3 witfiifi fan: wsskai,

‘ M mmmm §~%iGE~% gzsmgm QW Mfififikffiafifi MEGR

*§{$?;}1S’§u=’:§V3E§:.2’i’;:;{.£§§V;.’

“Ktfl”fll”‘|Q0|’fl’$.l) W mwmmmwmmwmtwm tHMWo’fi’iK'”f.’I wwwww ww mmmmmmmm WWW mmwm WW mmawmmmm mm-Ia vamjm” mi” ‘

£@arfi&d fiéditianai fifivgxmmemt Efivfieata i$

pezmittefi ta fiia fismm Gf Agpaaxancfi $3 §fi§a1fW;”