I IN THE HIGH COURT 0;? KARNATAKA AT A' BATED THIS THE 26m DAY OF 1' 4 BEFQRE..~~~ " THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE
CRIMINAL 1>ET1T1ciN=N_o. .274. 1* OF 1
BETWEEN: ” I
Sri.E\/Iohammed Th0ufif’;- .,
S/0 A.Anwar, ‘
Aged about 21 years, vv
Residing at NQ..23.46, 9′ _ _
Near Missi01f{Réja”€i, 4′
18’ Cross, Mai1di”V.1’v’EQha1Vi;3; ‘ ‘
Mysore. . . . .Petit:io1:1er
[By afifxa, Advecates]
AND :
State pf Ké{;=r1a’ia}§:ag V
By»_'{ija3:anagéara Police Station,
V ‘I V. ….. 14 «
_ . Mysore Tja1j;’r}..<: and District,
its Public Prosecutor,
High C'U:i'I_fi__E%1iiiding.
8Aa.;)ga1Qr€_;’2Q}i3 pending an ihea fikf gf Efijayafiagam
?€s§§e:fi:€ Siziiiéozz, Ixiyacara City, which is; Y€§§’iS§€f€?{§ for {ha
/*
W,
/°
/”
effenee puniehabie under Section 392 of {PC anti the
Prineipai District and Sessions Judge, i\Iiyee§e’~._:he.s
rejected the ban peeeon on 23io2,2e’:;i.”__’M%e-
Cri.Misc.Ne.208/2812.
This Criminal Petition eoIijiing_Afi:>:r 7:}r<'3',ers"e:i_
day, the court made the f0i1Qv.aingv:"»__A
0 R _
The petitioner arraigned as
accused No.2, file of the HI
Adcntionais 'i JMFC, Mysore
registereti under Section 392
of IPCVh to enlarge him on bail.
‘ ‘2.e–.Ii is ease of the prosecution that at about
24.11.2010, three unknevm persons
i\/iangeia euira (if the eompiainant
Sfri”i»nKE:§!’£;i’t.ii.a. while ehe wae returning home from her
2 i’ei;:i_iiveis heuse. in respect ef the said incident
iodgeei a repert Wiih the jurieeiieiienai
mpeiiee ‘eased en erhieiz the peiiee regieierefi :2: ease
egeiiiei ihree vhigiewri §€’f$@i}S, ifiezsiieg iEi’V!E’S§i§–&1§i€}I1,
$.14}
these petitioners along with two others “were
apprehended on 27.11.2010. Aeeerding to the”e_aSe’~»_ef
the prosecution, at the instance ef aee:L1see’£-C’jNte:;71_p’~
Mangaia eutra said to have 1*eieee;fCi”t.~Vfrei’:f1.’_’_the ‘ ‘
eompfiainant was recovered andtat ithet ifxtstaneep
petitioner, a meter eyele ea-;._:i*t_Q have tzeem »LirhiIe”w’
committing the offenee t5fe’1~n. thie date of
his arreet the petiti0t’ieti_’E:’ae, Custody.
His prayer tfiteetsions Judge for
bail eame=i’ the petitioner is
beforefiiis’ ‘
3.’EahavVe E*1eatfd»-thetétearned Counsel appearing on
betifig eicies. Ej€’¥1tS€d the records made available.
1 etzbmitted on behaif of the petitioner that
if’Ln.thEi abee,:iee of any particulars of the meter eyeie in
the eergepiaint hedged by the eemplainante recovery of
” teeter eyete gate’: te have been made at the instance ef
1′ Niiihie petitiener flees net ieeriminate him it: any manner.
it is fertttet” et:’ee1§:.’:ed that aeeueeé fiefi has eireaay
4
been granted bail by this Court and this;””pe’t’i:’iefi;ef~.
stands on the same footing as accused of:
the principles of parity he shouléi be:.ef1§a’:ige{:1.’GiIi’ T.
5. As stated supra, the-vepeeifie aliegatiohfzevfhade by.”
the eemplainant is thet while “w_as eOmi.r1g:§ towards
here house, three on a motor
Cyeie and one’a1n_Qng:Athe:fi¥ ;f;h.e”Manga1a sutra
and went efiay h complaint, the
details been furnished. Even
aeeoriiing the mangala sutra said to
have person of the Complainant
haefbveen feeQVefedV’at the instance of accused No.1.
Fig.3 h’aS””é11ready been granted bail by this
141 1 /201 1. Of course no recovery
h:::S” bee1ie:’j_:rEade at the instance of accused N0. 3.
Hoerever, “having regard ‘[0 the fact that the details of the
hieter eyele has met been furnished in the compiaint, at
ihie stage? mereiy on the basis ef the reeevery 0f meter
iiyeie matie 2:: ‘{he ;’:1eia11ee ef ihe eetiiéezzer’, it eehnet he
eaid the: grime faeie ‘ihe izweivezhenz :3? {he geiiiiener £21
‘J1
ihe offence aileged is establishevd,
no greunds to beiieve ‘:hatii_1’e-.VpeiitAIerie3f pf the
offence punishable wider Seeti{:}n__ 1382 View
ef the matter, this ‘4.fiie..”bpinien that the
petitioner is e:_ii;’it_1e<i bai} subject to
conditions;
:3. }_l1:1 A __r*esuI7:.;”~«.f:_i1e _-petition is allowed. The
petitione: is,or’de:i”e«ei* ‘*b:e’fe1eased on bail in connection
wi:i:j’eie.N§.i7j2oi’: 0}: the file of the 111 Additional i
(Jr.Dn.} and JMFC, Mysore (Crime
Vijayanagara Police Station, Mysore
siuiifijeeit to the following eonditiens:
V ” ‘_ ii)” The petitioner shall execute a personal
bond fer a sum 0f Rs.50,000/~ with
‘zwo solvent sureties for the like sum te
the satiefaetien of the learned
Magistrate;
{ii} The petitioner shall not iritiriiidate er
tamper wiih ihe preeeeutien witnesses
in any §I”1a§’i§’i{3£”:
‘<JMW.; .\
, «E X:
Ha shall appear on all hearing dates
before the court Without fail:
to the one alleged in the Case $1153.:
He shali net induige in any acts _$.i::ni};é*g’;9.1’L:’—- ”
(yr) He shall mark his at:’r:e?,n<3_éiI':}:a7T.A
jurisdictional prilicgt ori'<~3v%::*y 1'O'1"_: 3j_[1'"d
25"' of 'th€ eachV"J'J'C%;fi~f*f1CIaf'-diC1VitY1 V1fi11
disposal of ::ase..V"'W '
RS/*