High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Muniyappa vs State Of Karnataka on 19 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Muniyappa vs State Of Karnataka on 19 November, 2010
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 19"' DAY OF NOVEMBER. 2010

BEFORE:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE n.v.  

Writ Petition Nos.3958–4o65-oT2o.1o–(;A7;§ j;;4.r~__J.§: ‘

BETWEEN:

E.

SR1 MUNIYAPPA
S/O YARAPPA _
AGED ABOUT 50 YI3;ARS

W/O LATE L..S.NARAEANAsw*AMY’
AGED ABOUT’ 55 YEARS ”
MUNIYELEAMA./m– ‘ ._
W/O mfrE.;:NARA&*ANAPPA’
AGED.ABOUT*I?.Q. ”

N}3,RA1g’ANA1é:7;~. _» 4′ ‘ V _

S/OT LATE OHIKEA L AK…
AGED. ABOUT 65 YEAIRS ‘
;£’.’K,ANANlJAPAPA’1 T
_” /IO’ LATE KAPANAEAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

. ‘V ».NA%éA.tANASwAMY

-._S/”O i;AfrEANNAYAPPA
‘ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

AATEARAPPA
S/”O LATE CHIKKANNA

‘ «AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS

H VENKATARAMANA
S/O CHIKKARANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

10.
i1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

‘”17,

MUNINARASAMMA
W/O LATE GOVENDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

CI-HKKAPLANUMAIAH
S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

L.G.NARAYANASVVAMY _

S/ O LATE GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

GOVINDAPPA
S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

DODDANARAYANASWAMY
S/O LATE GOVINDAIAH. L 1. ;
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS _ *

OGOVTNDARAJIJ ._ I
S /O C 1.A£:s1–1:rv£I:¥e’AR;’xY;\.1\IA1AHY.. ‘
AGED ABQLIT”48’_.YEAES _ _ ‘

L.n.Y*1AN.1Dr~1A1*i&::;:_.

S50 (1 LAESHMINARAYANAYAEVOV
ASED.AEoU’;r’-j’43*YE,D’ A.RfS”.. ‘ –

LINGANNA , . V
S /0 DODDASUDDAIAH

_;AGED ASD1.Jfr’60 YEARS

A V. “” c.LAKS§iM1NAEAYANAPPA
” 1. S /Q SIKKAMUNNENKATAPPA
AGED ‘AE’avL::rr 70 YEARS

V N.LAKS’§V§MINARAYANAPPA
” S /’0 LATE NARAYANAPPA

AQED ABOUT 65 YEARS

“~SMT. GIDDAMMA
aw/0 LATE NARAYANAPPA

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

VVENKATESHAPPA
S / O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

21.

22.

I0
DJ

24.

25.

26.

27.


* .. V S;/Q’ DODDAMARAPPA

NARAYANAPPA
LATE NARAYANAPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

B G CI-IANDRASHEKAR
S/O LATE GANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

PATEL NARESEGOWDA _

S/ O LATE PAPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

SMT. SUNANDA OHANORASAEKARR . _

W/O CHANDARASHEKAR ‘
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

S/O LATE HANUMAP}’A- ;
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ‘

SHAMAS1;HvA1AH .
S/O SHANKARAPPA”. _
AG ED ;A£sOUT 2

A’
W/O LA’1:3;L.ROOJAPRA .
AGED ABOUv”:f’-5_0YEARS–. ‘ –

R1TO_P27 . ”

R/O THIPPURL

_ ; BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

” AGED “ABO_Ls’T 40 YEARS

29., A

‘ vAR.AI)AéPA
” S/’-0 LATE DODDAMARAPPA

AOI::D ABOUT 35 YEARS

‘P28 & R29 ARE

-A ‘R/O GONIPUR VILLAGE,

BANGALORE SOUTH TQ

R.MUNISWAE\/{Y
S/ O LATE GANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

33.

34.

35.

36.

39.», V _
” W/O VENKATAIAH

5′ 40V.S

” –. fl w.,(O LATE ..I_,’)ASAPPA
&AGi~3D’ABQIjT 75 YEARS

R. KRISHNAPPA
S / O LATE GANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

RMUNIMARAIAH
S/O LATE GANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

M.VENKATESH
S / O LATE SMUNIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

P30 TO P33 ARE _
R/O THIPPUR, v ‘

BANGALORE SOUTH ‘TALUK.,;’

PRABHAIAI-I .

S/O LATE MOPURAEAH
AGED ABOUT 69 ‘
VENKATAPPA V I ”

S/O LATE MARALAH 1
AGED AI3.OUT;'”73 YEEARS

s.H1vA1\fNA A

S./O LATEG’HO1\5NAPpA..’_’ .
AGED ABOU”[“‘8_8YEARS—- ‘ ‘

G.R.SHIVANN_A »
S/O LATE ‘RUr’;.RAJ_>PA’

AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

“-ASOMANNA
S/O LATE PUTTAVEERAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

APPAJAPPA
S/ O LATE KADARAPPA.
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

48.

49.

50.”

<3/O. LATEVCPIIELKACHENNABASAPPA

5

42. R LAKSHAIAH
S / O LATE RANGANARAYANAPPA.

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

MUNIRATHAMMA
W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA.
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

43.

KAMAKSIE

D /O MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

45. JAYAMMA V
W/O LATE NARAYANAPPAS
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS ‘

46. G A NARAYANASWAMY
S/O LATE APPAJAPP_A;_ .
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ‘

47. NARASHIMAMUR’1’H-Y’ — If V
S /O LATE N’A§zAYANAPpA;’
AGED AI3OU’.§j O49 _

M MARAPPA~–» ”

S/O LATE MARAEAH. , _
AGED ABOUT 68 *

KEMPARANGALAE
S/O LATE

V AGED ABOLIT 65 YEARS

AGEIj~ABQUT 58ja:’EARs

P34 &._4P5o

R/O GONIPURA VILLAGE,
. BANGALORE SOUTH 19

1 :iiA7\:JtJ*;\rDAswA1~AY
_ As/O LATE CHIKKA NANJAPPA
” ‘~AG1:;D ABOUT 52 YEARS

” –. ~ D/O LATE HANUMAMH,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

53.

54.

55.

56.

59.

60.

Q

VENKATAPPA
S / O JUNJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

S MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH.
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

RAMACHANDARACHAR
S/ O LATE RAMACHARI.
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS

HUCHAPPA

S/ O LATE MUNICHENNAF’FS’A–,.._V

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

GALAPPA

S /0 LATE NARASi1’»’£HP:IAI€.fL

AGED ABOUT 38 ‘

cH1KKANARAYANNAP”V» — If A
S/O LATE N;»x.RAYAN_APpA;’
AGED AEOU’1f-5; ‘*{EARs_V

MUNIYA.PI~5-A :;_ V

s/0
AGED ABOUT’-55AyEA_Rs.. ‘ ‘

MUNTRAJU A V
Us/0 NARA’YAN’APA.._

_; AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

NA;f§ASEANAMMAO””
” .. V s/.0′ LATE’ NARASIMHAIAH.

A-3ED”AEQVUT 70 YEARS

52.._OA
s/Q LATE NARAYANAPPA

KR1si%1’i§Ai5PA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

NARAYANAMMA
~ ‘OS/O DODDA NARAYANAPPA.

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS

P51 8: P63 ARE
R/O SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

64.

66.

67.

68.

‘ 69.

70.

A AN USUYA
D / O P APPAYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS

GANGANNA
S / O LATE CHEKKA NANJAPPA.
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

SRIKANTAPPA
S/O LATE REVENNA, ..
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS ‘

SHIVAMMA
S/O LATE SHIVANNA.
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

P64 8: P67’ ARE _ .
R/O GONIPURA VILLAGE, : 1 V V
BANGALORE SOUTH'”1Q- ‘–

VENKATARA1VEANAPPA”‘ — If A
s/0 cH1:§3«NA..G’_’iRIYAppA,..
AGED AB1f)U’if’S45_ ‘(EARS

_
8/ O LAT’E.A’jfR_1;<uM1ALLAIAH,.
AGED ABO'1'Uf'3A5TYEARS—- ' '

GOVIN_DMAH' A
s/0 LATE? GQc:Gc;–.1AH;'

AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

NA%}A:éA,.JU M SSSS H

V' " –. . S;'.Q" MATHADEVAIAH
AGED ABOI_.J'T 36 YEARS

72.

A cH1§DAMARAPPA

ABOUT 59 YEARS

V’-«P68 8: P72 ARE

–*R/ O DODDAKUNTANAHALLI VILLAGE

BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

73.

74.

76.

77.

78.

79.

80.

VENKATASVVAMAPPA

S/O LATE BOMMANNA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/O THIPPUR VILLAGE
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

SADASHIVAIAH
S / O LATE JANARDHANA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

MUNIMARAIAH
S/ O LATE KADARAPPA.

AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS _

KONDAPPA
S/O LATE MARAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58

DASAPPA ‘ ‘
S/O LATE GOOGAPPA, ”
AGED ASQL: 1* 70 YEARS ..

~

S/O A13.–A,._ ‘

AGED G

sR_:NIVASA’u * -~ ., A ”

S/O LATE
AGEDDABOUT 45,YEARS

V 4 ; .MUNIKR_i_SHNA’
DQDDA
AGED _A1=;QUT 35 YEARS

A A.1\’«1A h ‘A
ID/O ANJEENAPPA

‘ AGED ABOU’I’ 48 YEARS

82.

SRVIAMARIYAPPA
S/O MARAPPA

“AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

SR1 K.VENKETESH

S/O LATE KURLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

84.

85.

86.

87.

88.

89.

V’ 9’0,-

9

P74 & P83 ARE
R/O DODDAKUNTANAHALLI VILLAGE
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

SR1 VENKATARAMANAPPA
S / O CHI PA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS

SR1 SADASHIVAIAH
S/O LATE SI-IIVANNA ._
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ‘

SR1 KEMPAIAH
S/O LATE BOMMANNA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

SMT. SOUBHAGYA .
D/O MUNIRAJU ‘ .

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS ”

P84 5: P87 ARE — if A
R/O GONIPURA v1L,LA(_;E..’ A ,
BANGAL,O,RE;’fsQ_UTH. TALUK, ;. V

SMT. 1v1.I.;N:3ig\1\/I1\}ixx

w/0 LA’1’EVMU1’E£YTAPPA_

AGED ABOUT-75AYE;ARS.. ‘

R/O DODDAKU_NTA1\IA”VILLAGE,
BANGAL0RE’–s0:J’1H TALUK

4 ; ‘R. KRISHNAPPA
vs/,0’ LATE RANG..A£’PA
‘ AGED_AB_OUT 50 YEARS

O V R. j::vzU1§iR.A;1.~U
«LS/0 ILATB RANGAPPA

A AGEDTABOUT 48 YEARS

91″.

R, MUNISWAMY
S /0 LATE RANGAPPA

A “~_AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

P89 & P91 ARE

R/O THIPPUR VILLAGE
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

92.

93.

94.

95.

96.

97.

98.

99.

10

SR1 RAMACHANDRACHAR
S / O LATE RAMACHARI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS

R/ O SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE.
BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

SR1 KEMPAIAH
S / O LATE BOMMANNA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS

SR1 MUGABUL AHAMAD
S/O LATE SYED GOUS
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS _

SR1 GOVINDAPPA
S/O LATE GARUDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

SR1 G.L. NARAYANAr=RA–.
S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH _ .
AGED ABOUT 45

SR1 .

S/0 LATE

AGED Av.SO_U’»;f SGYEARS ‘a

SR1 NAN-.3 ‘ ‘D ‘ —–
S/C) LATE 1.:NGA1AH..__ ‘ _.
AGED ABOUT 80. YEARS

; SRLDODD.AH’ELAG;A1AH S.K
‘/O LATE CHIEKAHAIAGAIAH

9’ AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

1’09. 2

–..V.w/’O_’LA’1′;E RAJANNA

‘ AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

10:.

‘KADARAPPA
S/”O LATE HONNAPPA

A ‘9 AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

9:929.

H SRI HUCHCHAIAH

S/O LATE KADARAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

103.

E04.

105.

E06.

107.

108.

11

SMT. YELLAMMA
W/O LATE BUDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

SR1 NARASIMHMMAIAH
S/O LATE VENKATA?PA
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

SR1 HUCHHAIAH _
s/0 LATE SIDDAIAH V
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

SR1 RAMASWAMY
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

SR1 M. NAGARAJUV ._ 3
s/0 LATE MUNIYAPPA _
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS V ‘ ‘

SRINANJUNDAEAHEZ ~ :
S/O LATE’LI1§21GA_1A.vh”*. 4_ ‘
AGED gABC:_{.JT’~8€i_YEAf?_S ‘
P9361 P108 . ._

R/O GONIP.URA’ViL’LAGE .
BANGALORE.’S.QUTHAVTAL..U’K PETETIONERS

[AB3’__S1’iV Sri S Thejashwini, Advs.]

– CS’EATE’A~OF

VIVDH1~’kNA– SOUDHA.

V f_ “’13ANG;.x.LQRE.
*- %R1?;1>..jB,_Y {is CHIEF SECRETARY

SECRETARY TO THE

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

‘ ._V1KASA SOUDHA,
__«BANGALORE — 560 001

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD [KIADB)
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO. I4/3,

12

RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT BUILDINGS.
II FLOOR NRUPATHUNGA ROAD.
BANGALORE — 560 001

REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE
CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY.

A PLANNING AUTHORITY CONSTITUTED A ~ I

UNDER TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING
AUTHORITY ACT, 1961 HAVING; ‘ ,
ITS OFFICE AT MS BUILDINGS. *’
BANGALORE ~ 560 001

M /S NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE’-.
CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD V’

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER
INDIAN COMPANIES_ACT. 5195.5′ ~ ‘– _
HAVING ITS REGISTERED O_FEI.CE ‘
AT NO.I, MIDFORD HOUSE. 7 ‘ ‘

MIDFORD GARDENS, OPP: MGROAD, I I

BANGALQ’RE3jg.’560 D01.
REP BIKITS M;_A_NAGI4I~IG:.DIRECTOR V

BANGALORELD EVELOIPM AUTHORITY

KP –I 560620
REP. ‘BYI’IS'(jQAMMI’SS1I0.NER

SPECVEALI DEPUT:i’C.O’M.MIISSIONER
LAND ACQUISITION, KIADB {BMICP}

‘ GANDHINAGAR.

._ “<BANG»ALORE' «–. 009

A " * ..f1H_E'.IJ'I~.IIOvN OF INDIA

RF1P«_ BY EISSECRETARY TO

. F'—.IMINISTR'I'§OF ENVIRONMENT
AND. FQ.RES'I'S.
PARYAVARAN BI-IAVAN,

CGG COMPLEX.

A. NEW DELI-11- 110 003

.. KARNATAKA STATE

POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
M.G. ROAD.

BANGALORE — 560 001

REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN

13
E0. SRI ASHOK KHENY,

MANAGING DIRECTOR,

M/S. NANDI INFRASTURCTURE

CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LTD

A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER

INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956

HAVING ITS REGTD OFFICE AT

NO.1, MIDFORD HOUSE,

MID FORD GARDENS

OFF MG ROAD

BANGALORE ~ 560 001 –

11. NANDI ECONOMIC CORRIDOR

ENTERPRISES LTD,

No.1, MIDFORD HOUSE, .

MIDFORD GARDENS, ‘

OFF MG ROAD EANGALORELT

REP. I-3YI’IS CONSTITU’I’ED_____ ” _ E
ATTORNEY SRI A RU D_RAG.OUDAj ” “RESPONDENTS

[By Sr1I:~R’>IVeiII<s.t&e«;;'Ie. I'JacIdeI:i,"AGrA for R1 & R2;
V ____ R Gdpaiaswgmy', Adv. for R6:
I M/SE..jK_ing7'§a'nd 'PaTt_ridge}WAdVS. for R5 & R10;
Sri V"CTha_n'd-ztashekar, Adv. for R7}

THESE» PETIjI:ON'S FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CON'S1TfIjITON OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE

_ RECORDS RELATING TO BANGALOREMYSORE
__1NF.RAS'FRUC'i'IjR-E CORRIDOR PROJECT FROM THE STATE

AU*;;*s-:TORI'TI"'I~:SINIRESPECT OF ENTERING INTO MEMORANDUM OF
UN13.ER$}TANE)ING WITH GOVERNOR OF STATE OF

MASSDACIIUSEITS, USA PERSUE THE SAME AND ETC.

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

I THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOwING:–

14
ORDER

Combining different causes of action in ag single
petition and presenting one common petition not
desirable, can cause unnecessary complications
petitions deserve to be dismissefjraird.
allowed, it can create confusion
the court whose caused
independent of the common
petition is nothing of parties. The
registry shoLi’ld’fnfiot different causes of

action whi_ch:j_if’include’5fiseyoral”gWrit petitioners having

different ‘–caus’es’fj-of “and having acquired rights

through different

2. ‘i3’h’erefore;”‘wh.i.le these writ petitions are dismissed,

I liberty” to these petitioners to present separate

iniditcating their causes separately.

3. “Ho:rNeVer, the registry is directed to entertain fresh

“mp.etift”Aions by these petitioners, by treating the court fee

herein as the court fee on such fresh petitions av

15
when presented, if the petitioners quote this order, in
those petitions as these petitions are being disrriissed

without going into the merits of these _Lb~ut

reserving liberty to the petitioners fresh

separate petitions within a periodrof ‘fotuf “weeks from

today.

4. Interim stay granted i these writ
petitioners in WP will enure to the
petitioners fora Vperi:oCi”‘of:iLfrom today, within

which timfgit. A;s§§_jJp.ei1ito_1thes..e petitioners to file fresh writ

for presenting fresh Writ
petitions__is yeo’1itirfiied;”-petitioners may have to pay fresh

Cour ‘L fee.

Ed/~

}UD@§

~