High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Muthuraju vs State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri Muthuraju vs State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH cancer or KARNATAKA AT BAN&AL§'_}QE~~. 

DATED THIS we 26?" DAY OF AuausT;;     

BEFORE:-I  

THE i»«!ON'8LE MR.:rusm:E MOHAM sHAmAi=.iAeou%z:%Aa k 

camxmz. PE1ITIC}:§f.'r~£O .3659.?2'0{§8  

BETWEEN :

Muthuraju
S]o.Muz1iyap§a  
Aged 35 ycarsg' '   ._
Rfo.Vadda1?a;s81'y£i_V_ " '
Haragaddc €?c>sji:  _ '

Jigani I:_1.1"11'l<:.. f" .

Bangakgre ._Urbai;   '   "

(By Sn': M3?-41F<aj§31ma';"§c1v§;}~ %

ANDQ ' 'V

._ 'Statue «:1f"'I{:_aJ.11"a:§:aka
  Exgisc inspector
75r1.¢'1_*'3l' ' 'r.''}i'5¥'i§101,''5i ' V 

(By  Ifibiznéétppa, HCGP)

.. PEJTITIONER

.. RESPONDENT

_ . . ‘ V’ his C:ri.P. is fded under Section 439 of C’.r,P.C. by the
h afiiivocatc for the petitioner praying that this H0n’b1£: Couzt

I
F»)
?

may hit pleaaad to enlarge: the petitioner on bail
Na} 108439 of Anekal Excise Divisiim, rc:gist€:re4(i.. Ti’«::g_:{‘._Vt11:=:
Qffemves punishable: under Sections, 32, 34,

Kaxnataka Excise. Act, pending 011

P3″I.C.J.(Jr.Dn.) and JMFG, AEfik&L,..,,

This CILP. Coming on far

made the fo}l0wiI1g:~

Petifio;1€::;§§S accused ifyfcxime No.1/2008,

r43gistc1’ed..iff;3;’y. thég; 1.;:111’;i$.h5:~1bi<3 under Secticms 32,
34, Excise Act, by Excise

In3pect{;f;'–4 A ' S ' «

pet§.fi{5:1——i$ filed under Saction 439 of €3r.P.(3.

to the petitioner.

of the: pI'{)$€=E:L1’iiG1′}. is that the Excise

Iiispegffiéiar as per the directions 0f the superiors,

i.n§§;ected the hcsuse cf the petitianer at 8.00 pm. on

\r~/S’

he carmot be shown 33:13 ieniency, inasmuch asffizie act

of the petitioner viii} spoil the health of

Petitian stands dismissed’.””‘ A