High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri N Gurappareddy S/O … vs Special Deputy Commissioner … on 20 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri N Gurappareddy S/O … vs Special Deputy Commissioner … on 20 September, 2008
Author: N.Kumar
é » AA 'I'h.£= Téhaildar

V the Constitution af India. praying to quash the impuwod order

is 11m 1-nan cum': or xnmmmm A1'   T  ,  A} 
Damd ms 3": 29:1: day      ' j_T f
  _  %
1112 Karma   
Writ Petition 'No.  
EEN:        ~  V

Sri N Gmappamddy  
8/0 Nanjunde:v¢ifi%¥ 
Agczd ab0t1 l48  , .  .
Res. At: RésmaaaVgarfix"'v'ilI$sge .. '

Attibelc Hobli - V     

Anelcal Taluk * V   »-- V  

(By__Sri Rameah N, Advocate)

1 "p Sml_  ' er
.Revenuei'!)_e;)artzne-nt
Bangaipre

 " Anekal Tahxk
 Anckal ...Rcapondc.nts

(By Szti Chithappa, Spcxfml GA)
Th:isWritPbfition7mfiledundcrArticlcs Zféfiaud 227:)!'
dated 1'7-1 1-2004 Vida Annwxurcr-D pmsed by respondent-1.

5/

_____ .. n

his vendor have chaficnged flax oxdarswmd ‘4

pcfition in a rmvw. neither the A’

produced the Gnma} ‘ grant to su§Jaj.nnb’Afitg”‘thcir .

pmpcrty. in the absence of any
in the property in question by hh
vendor, no mumfion may name. That
b1mwm$rwmniE§hmfim$§ihdm§¥’fimfim,flm
PUWBI’ ‘ under Section
135(3) of me” Ac’: by deleting the
name of and valid and do not
cfllfix my fi@flfi§#¢ ;@mdhmm.flkrpuflhn u

Sd/-

Judge