High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri N Krishnappa vs Sri Basavaraju on 23 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri N Krishnappa vs Sri Basavaraju on 23 June, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
- 1 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE
BATED THIS THE 2313) DAY OF JUNE 2009
BEFORE

THE HOWBLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH 3.5501?  :, u 

BETWEEN :

SR1 N KRISHNAPPA
S /0. LATE NANJUNDAPPA

AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS

R/O. NALLJ-KPPANAHALLI

DEVANAHALLI TALUK 

CHENNARAYAPATNA. HOBLI 3  «  _4 V 

BANGALORE RURALDISTRlC'1'=.--_  _     v _ .. PE'i'I'¥'IONER

(By s:4.AMAREsHAA:§GADI,Apy3 '   A
AND: ' V' 1 .

srzz BASAV?ARAJ.IJ   . 
s/0. sm M'iJNIYAFPAN'£%I.A"-.%<  _
AGED Aaoursz YEARS '  -
R10. NALIAPP£1NAB'ALLl_
DEVANAHALL1 'I'i:I.I}K. _  ._
CHENNE:LRA'1'APATNA HOBLI

" v. 'RURAL DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENI'

%L%%%tBvi:wrvmBHA»ADW

Iifiititi

' .._f;4H1s,cR:L§?'Is FILED U/s.432 CR.P.C av THE ADVOCATE FOR THE

 '§ET1Tz<:ug1$zpRAY1NG TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY mm

..v4A"'---Ri§SP{3NDEi'¥£; us: c.c.1~:o.493/2003 (PCR.2'IO.116/2007) U/S. 420 or we

  1i.GA£Né"E'_. THE PETR. on THE ma; are THE PRL. cm. (.JR.DN.) & Jmm,
._ «TQEVANAHALL1.

THIS PE'l'I'l'IO¥\¥ COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS BAY, THE

" ~ 'WCOUR'? MADE THE FOLLOWING:

cmmmu. PETITION ri.:«s9s5(2_:__.__.rg_Q§~.VV V 77[j  3 _: "



- 2 -
O R. D E R
Petitioner has sought for quashing of the  in

C.(3.No.'493/ 2008.

2. Respondent has filed a  V' ' 

200 for an ofience punishable under 4310

registration of the complaint, ‘ L’

matter under Section 156(3) of fof imlostifiéation.

3. Learned Counsel — submits that, the
Police have rcg’§m%od- is ixnpennissihle.
In this this Court reported in
ER 199.1 Kaié _ matter of A.LAKSHM4NAN –~vs–

STATE or ‘KARNA’mr<:A_;- : " — *

mnsédering the fact that the matter referred

V"_11;_;3.§iVi':":.VSeofion,.: i56(3) of Cr.P.C., the Police having registered

the Magistrate is not bound by the

of F'.I.R. Learned Magistrate is required to take

H u on his own. Even assuming that the F.I.R. number

but ultimately it is the report, which has to be

VT "s't:{fimitted under Section 158 of the Code of Criminal Pxocodure.

D? On the basis of the report, it is for the learned Magistrate to

take cognizance of the ofihnoe. I find no gzmund to interfere

with the proceedings. insofar as other conttmtims as

regard to the discrepancy in the registered sale a.,

matter for the ( Court to decide.

In the light of the above, am petition: _V T