IN THE HIGH COURT (>1: KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE
Dated; This the i7*h day cf Aprii is
BEFORE'.
THE HON'BLIE3 MR..mS':*1cE x;:j:.JA§:;Ar;N';af:':§A;§'* _ T 1}
M.F.A'Ne.979;'2@Qs {M-..'if.} V
BETWEEN: _
SR; N R ANANTHANARAYANP. j' V _
3,10 LATE N L RAzs5A;YAN%G;§sR n
AGED 45 YEARS, R/AT As:,*;ie§rg1«:_.:§z;:r,¢:;z.:=s.I' s£sAéfié_:,.. ,é}.1;>'v.j;
AND:* H 'H
1 SR1 SUBBBVREEI' v ---
Sm V.E:NKA'I'f2A.J_ "
. 152,10 GIUDALAHA-LLI
'~3*.,U3'TANUR _
B?&?£GALQRE 7"?
INSURANCE: ca gm
ASHGK as PAT'§L, ADV. mg R12)
'-_rB{;i $3,-_Nx:>"22, DVG MAEN R(Z}fiaD
BA;E§A\£e§NAGrUDi, BANGALORE 4
" mima; MANAGER
.., f~%ESP{}N DENTS
MFA P'§LE1B {HS 173(1) {FF MY ACT AGAINST 'THE
'";3:§nc;M;3NT AND AWARD DATED: 53.22097 PASSED IN
MVC'. NO. 415912085 {TIN THE FILE 'OF THE XVII1 ADDL.
JUDGE, COURT C}? SMALL CABSES, MEMBER, MAC'I'~4,
M£1'I"'R("}P{}LIT1AE\§' AREA, B:';N€}ALCéRE§;, (SCTL(§H.NO.4}.
fractiue 0? the iaft tibial coI11it~.1;xh45f: date-:j)f aésciéént;
and liability is on the "i;1_s3.u'afi.§::z'i 'Su'é3'i11itted
that no enhancemerzt' is
5. ':13-i:<%:* Eiabiiigiiy' liéiéig adrnittcci by
the: lczarxggd f.',<_:'~':i'_:i"_'EA16 «iiisifiance Cemparay, the
f"1nciiI:g_A9f-. ii;1'1i$ regard will have ta bx:
modifimi ;9ut:iI§g_ '£§;1t3.' "'_};ia.bility an the insurazzce
, CGi°Il'}%}{:1I1js£ and fiat 921 the owner.
V " as fiI"lhaII(3€I1}€i1i. is concerned, Sines
the--..ap§§iE%_a;i:t:Ti1.as adxnittcd that he is werktixzg for thfi
"very Sazizé company wan after the: accitient and
h_ a5..'L:ig regard in the nature of injuries sustained by
whim, I am of the View that tuowaycls 1053 sf mnenities sf
V lift': 3. 51.1111 of Rs.15,{3{}{}/- can be awaréed and
tfiwarcis futtlrfi inadicai expenses 3 sum ::)f
$"
*1
Rs. 1;3,{){}D/ -- is awardad and 'wider ether heads, the
compensation awarded is just and pmpez'. Thus, the
c0111pe13sa%;;i.o21 gets enhanced b}?_;¥§Is,_3{},C¥{}{);;'§: §'::fV
which only Rs.15,(}OO/~ will car1js}':.iI1{§éI'ti:'St 69%. ?f
The award stands Vt w1i;y
al1owi:t1g flflij appeai firut. 01":
the iI1S11I'8J;1C€ cQ:11pan§%,
A Iudgé
Dan":
VJJ :
03.96.2009
M.F.A.No.97é2i2f3G5f1’ia?M1 A’
ORBER ON “w?§E1¥1j€(} fipfixgx V
Heard the leained i11 fiI'{iS§3€Ct
of modification of the t11is éou11: on
:7.04.2m9. ” V. > ‘
The £3: suught. for
modification 1: cf gmund that the
appellané ~ for treattnezlt. In
this far the appeliant has filed a
mfidicai c’za§:ed.”-18 LE}4.2CIG9.
..A;;;*;i1ervvV§;22«I11€3, the 1€:a:rm:s:1 Ccrunscl for the
xi’e:sé}pgs’3idci§t,f comyany submitted that this Court
13.a$ §;}aSs§:»d~ :t;lr§.;:ATjucigmen£ aftsr considexing the matéfial 03:1
‘~___ rr:cerd Zthemfem :10 further enhancament or modificatien
“is :mc:3;;:=:<.i.
This Court on 1.’?ZG4.2{}G9§ aftcz” heariag 43:13 Iaamed
DCGIZIISCI for the: gzarties, fhozlght it fit 1:0 enhance the
} =r-.3′{,~”‘*~.