IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W'P.No.£ 2925 OF 2008
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALO%'§E:
nxmn 'ram THE 17113 my me' "
REF-'ORE
me HoN'aLE MR. JUSTI€ §Em N.iA'THiMMA;lAH._: »
AGED A::3ou1:%~rEARs, ' V ¢
No.7e,KHaco:.:pNv,
QQF!{'RQ$Bg- NAb&:3.;A£~iGUD'TOWN',"' V '
wsoae nxerarcwy ' --
B M amsHAN:<A:2a v _ '
are DRMALLAPFA "3 ' ,_
AGED ABQUE45 YEARS. .~
M113 em MAIN R*3AD,-
$ARA$~ATHtp:JRA,
PETIHONERS
A(Es;r.Sri'_:__t2AS'5iA§J§_ 13. NARENDRA 0 v GOWDA, ADVOCATES)
_ AND { » T' " '
THE sixre OF KARNATAKA
TLDEPARTMENT 0F MNES AND GEOLGGY.
A' ' "¢%KA$ SOUDHA,,
= _ E_3E;.AMBEDig['c§cv§ 'ADvc'3cATE )
T};l1:SWRiT F'E§TE'¥!C$N }.s%%§:%;aa 'W359 ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTSTUTEGN ._:z<:r};a_. pmvsue TO QUASH me
ORDERIRESC'.-i.U'TlAON DI. 'a9.a.2aos was ANNEXURE o PASSED av THE
R3 IN SO FARTHE f°ETiT!ONEx?.$..'LARE CONCERNED EN PARA 'i. AND TO
QUASHVTHE NOTKTES GT) 'Ei4;9.2008, 1.9.2008, 'h'4.9.2008 WDE ANNEXURE
__ R, R1 ISSUEENEY THEVR4lf
_ V'TH§;~é§"w£§¢I_ Perrriou comma on FOR PRELIMENARY HEARENG,
'.TI~i}S DAY,..'[HE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWENG:
ORDER
x f5et§iioner, assaiting the corractnfis of the
‘_’irz3V§p’ug;uhed orderlresolution dated 29″‘ August 2008 vide
‘An nexure Q on the file of the third respondant in so far
ER THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.’f€o.I2925 OF 2038
EN THE HIGH COLFRT OF KARNATAKA AT Bt¥NC:’.ALORE W.P.Ne.I 2925 GP 20138
3
as the petitioners are concerned, have preeentecffixe
instant writ pefition. Furfiwer, petitioners A’
the correctnws of the impugned noticee..detedV:t:et!4ml”
September 2008, 19″ Septemirger
September 2088 reepectivel3ri’_v.id.e
R2 issued by fourth reenondent;:’_l:
2. ln pursuanceefiiltlme iiesued by first
respondent 163″ it under the
Karnataka Miner Rules, 1994,
petitionei”e~~ il’li%r’f::aaiifgr«reir’imeications and their
eppllcatiene and their respectively
highest bicl iaecapted. Accordingly, «me
3 V’ aiease agreeiiients have been executed for lifting
seine under me Karnataka Minor Mineral
V Conefistpn All these petitioners have been
“en lifting at sand in their respective allotted
it is the case of rmpendents that, in View of the
‘miinplaints received from fiwe general public and aise for
THE EIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE W,P.No. 12925 OF 2038
E}? HIGH CGURT OF KAENATAICA AT BAVGALORfr3 W.P.No. I 2925 OF 2008
6
initiated by the competent authority is unilaterai invnénéjrg
since no opportunity as such was afforde;§i’_:’ié’
petitioners.
5. In ‘me light of the facts arid
case, without expressing abng’L:~~.;;pinidn.__ “find
demerits of flwis case _.’3nd’..rti”:V# _:’Sf£in§i hrékten the
respective parties throfikgfr’ suffice
for this Courfif to both
parfies, it arid safeguard
the intere=:jt A 1.”
6. Hévirrg and circumstancm of
the c:asej:,’ ~35 abt.$*ure:T, the writ petition filed by
pemaaneg isr’;=:s:~+.jmasec: arm are following directions:
§?~’Tf1-évlimpugnedthree notices dated 15*
r x/§”* sefitember 2003, 1*’ September 2003 and
A ‘A,_’f*”–9r3″‘ September 2008 vide Annexures R, R1
‘V R2 respectiveiy are hereby directed to be
IN TEE HEGH CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l2925 Ci? 2698
KN THE HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.} 2925 OF 2008
‘1’
treated as Show cause notices issued to
petitioners;
If] These three petitioners are VV H
to file their respective
said notices within
of receipt of a copy of V M
1:11 The
ccnfemplatedv’ Miner
directed to
_ ecpropriete order
em, c with the relevant
pmwéions tr%’?é’:u~efc:eseid Rules, after
‘eficfding ~:.~ab1e oppommity to petitioners
V ” of the same, as expeditiousiy as
c any rate, within a period of two
AA from the date of receipt of reply cum
% ” fcbjecfions from the pet’ ‘
35 THE H363 CGEERT OF KARRATAKA AT BANGALGRE W.?.Nc.i2§25 SF 20-$8
EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE W.P.No.£ 2925 OF 2968
8
7. Wrdu mesa observations, the writ petition filed by
petitioners stands disposed of.
BM\/*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAREQATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.2~2o.l2925 0? 2608