IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE 126: DAY or _ THE HOKBLE am. JUSTICE vmrr PETITION Nos. 15753 85 igsfim. BETW EEN SRINSREENNASA NAi1)U_r- i S/C}.(3 NARAYANASWAMXNAIDU V' AGE:5-4 YEARS", j ANNA?00RN:3:s1r:fevARI':N11;A*;A _ ANJANI EXT?)-.'NSlii);Nj, (:.H_;.:§z'i'.HAMA1a1 . CHIKKABALLApUVjéALi,'Dts?' " ' « ' . . 4 PETITEONER (Byifixi :3 R SUNn5gg.RAJA GUPTA, ABV ) AI~E : TH£;i"REc:1t5:é.;*xi, TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORES RURAL ._BDA <:m;:PLi«:X, KORAMANGALA 8ANGAL'ORE--56O 034 A '=f'B.Y ms SECRETARY RESPONDENT
mgiay Smt ; M (3 NAGASHREE, ASA )
THESE WRIT PETITIONS FILED UNDER ARTICLES
226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTl’I’U’I’lON OF INDIA PRAYING
TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER ANE)
M
msmss OF THE PETmoNER’s APPLICATIONS.-AA’PiiLE:9. –
31.1o.2w3 FOR RENEWAL OF THE s’rAGE..,_.s:.P;rs;g:).
9/99-2000 AS PER ANNEX~A AND B.[>ANQA ” ‘ V
‘I’HESE PEFITIONS, % comma T<":::i~.?f '%15cii¢:%V%
}?'RL.HEARING, THIS DAY 'm'1=;%_ COURP
FOLLOWING:
The pCtitiOI1CI”S … even date
3 1.10.2003 No.3 /99
and 9/ when were not
mspondgd __ .A 1 Regiégrlal Transport Ofiicer,
Bangalofé these petitions for a
WI’itV,£j§ffI1i¥I1daIf£{1§’V$.V I
Govt Advocate submits that if
g time, the petitioner’s appkications
K V» V’ considered and order passed, in accordance
— Hljaw, if net already done.
5%
3. Racording the submission of M
counsel, petitions am acu)rding13?A’VcIi’spo:§cd.;
for compliance threemonths
csg