Sri Nanjunda vs State By Circle Inspector Of … on 15 October, 2011

"L
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS '"I'}*IE', 15?" DAY OF OCTOBER  1

BEFORE

THE I-IONBL-E MR.JUS"{'ICL§1 A.S.PAC}i'HAPfij}§E   

CRLAPPEAL NQ-;299,x20_: 1 " f   V'
BETWEEN: A  'L  V 

SR1 NANJUNDA

S/O THIMMEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 3% YEARS  

R/AT DODDKA1W\N.§iE»'{AAL.5x " 1' V 

Hi}. KOTB3 TALUK   _    _.';%.ApPELLAN'r

(BY SR; '1',Y.K.%\irWA_»vv--At>Vo'eA§§§:j"V_ 1 " 

AND:     

STATE Bi?'ci:2c;i; 1N$13~;§;cfrQR -
OF POL.EC§:'2,~ BEELCHANAHALLI.  RESPONDENT;

{ BY sRr¢Q;M. ‘$Ri’3§{1v;§’s:A’ 12193131)? HCGP)

jrmé s:§PP:a2x1,.”:s”§*£LED UNDER SE’3C.S?’4{2} C:.P.C.
mim A pRA”r*z:R____f§Q Sm.’ ASEDEZ THE ORDER mrrm

_ A §VE\7 S.C, NO.,12/2009 CG1\§’\r’1CTEi\fG THE APPELLANT
‘ _ FQE{–.TE’IE’..Q’¥’Eé+ENCE PEENISHABLE EJFQBEZR SECAQSR 30′?

‘ ..§Tz>«::T; ”

*§;%”_:sA§%PE;-xi, CORIIENG mg GR§)Ei?’..R-S mi: Ti-EES mix:

?§*.z;__~:E §:~’s;-i?H\EG:

. ®§-‘i§}E§§€
“E316 ieaznad ceunsai F03′ iéze :3:p;3s:§§a:’:%; 1S abssm.

” Ofiice objectiens are not corrzpiied wit,h. though ihe niatter

has beam a<§jm.12?'r:€£% 50;: office Gbjsctiarga an 4 C*€?CaSSi0I'3S..

ix.)

Hence. the appeal is disrnigsed for non e::on'1p}iaI:{%e of {)ffiC,E;'*:

Gbjeciions.

(“kg