in THE HIGH count or KARHATAKA, _ DATED mus me as?" on or % 3 _: « asma-£% THE Hg-msgl.E INK--'"3Tl(::E..!'i:§Bl.LL"'.°:'$?.4Lj,. 1 V' ETWEEN: Srmanjundaswamy, Slo. Late subbaiah, Aged about58ve;m., A - _ % RJa.G.l.1.Street"Pe%%,-' ~ " " (By su.T.P;Ra;§&:¢§ hen). Depaxtmcnt of Gcaapemfimz MMMMM 14 § No.1;"AiiAalmr"Road. ed:-5&052 A ' The M5 mmcwpmw ° % Ham om, P.B.No.14, L'/% Mandya~5?1 401 . (By an. 'r.P.srensm, AGA for n 8*; Sri.H.C.Shivaramu for R3} & This Writ Paation kffiigd 226 ...a 227 of the oomtmxtion' of India case: @196 30-9-2008
mad by me man: % Anname-4= and
direct me Rub 1a(2)
of the Karma&5{§«4._ (Second Amerment)
Rules to me petitioner by
eaderzdimfi the 55 years ea so years etc..
This mm’ ” Em for Preummary Hearing’ in ‘B’
group this 31¢ Cat’:-at flue foiiowing:
A ‘is: under mm 226 am 227 of the
the petitioner has casted in question the order
ms also has sought for writ of mmmus
% fin mpormm to emu: ma mm of the Amended
%¥ at the Kamama C-o–operahv’ e Swieties (Sm
RuIes.2008dated1?–9-2008. Further. he hassoum
“foradirectionto therespondes’1No.3topaythe saiazyfrom
S%ber,2008 mww&m£aliwm bm%.
&/
2. The learned coma: for the pmom
the petieona is errfified to the beam of the
med 2&7.2ooa and also the me A
Karnataka Co-operative sociem
2008. extmding em man (if 5%*,,.»«.;i,»:%:re.¢; am ‘And %
therefore, thé impugned order a .
3. m,;% not dispute
this and to the harm of the
83:96 asso the amended Rule
13(2) §§=Mé A Societies (Second
Amendn1ent)2″i?.;g£s.. ~ %
Therefore*
the writ mean” is allowed and the
at Amexum-F is hereby quashed and the
% are dimcted b axasnd the benefit of the eavammam
_ é 23-7-zoos and atso flae amended rule 13(2) of $9
_ _4 Ka.r;1aialca Co-operative soc.-setsas (Second Amemmm) Rm.
~ ~ 2008itothe The mpmaem’ N03 is also directed
34/
ks paythesalaryfrom Octobarzowanwardsand aliconsequgntiai
List this matter for ‘For Being Spoken To’ an M *
raquwed by the lwmed counsel for ” A
..;contd.,