KJUKI OF KARNATAKA NEG!-I COURT AAQIKKARNATAKA HIG!-4 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
IN THE HIGH caunm er Kmnxnmaxn, BAHGALGRߤIM_
namsn TEIS THE 27 ms may or JUNE 2p§3C§{»"v"C
BEFORE MWC
THE EON'BLE Mm. JUSTICE C§,7§i:n£EéAV:"" CC
WRIT PETITIGN Na. e22eO@f<2ob3»(cM£a§¢}"OC
BE'I"P?EEN
SR1 . NAB.fi.SIlf'-EA 1*-IIIIRTHY
arm NANJUNDAPEA"_ "" ,A C,C .,C
AGED ABGUT 32 23$: :1 :~* *_"?u-;
Riam Na. 126;"KfiMEALAfiOEUx"£'
VXLLAQE, KE§$EfiI§HGBLIf.O-.
BANGALORE w_?é '*,C*,-. *
BAHGALORE ¢IT¥z__¢_%C*
~ L A O." . PETITIONER
[By 3:1: M{°sa1v3§fia£ASH AND
s;;iuMwRALxnnAavB.R. – ADVU¢A$E3]
sni;Cfiag37Khfi§°
:C*"8f0'LAEE,HEMfiJIRAD
$33 335$: as YEARS
'"«:RjA: R0. 3035, xrxn MAIN
r; 3923; GAIAEHRI xnasn
-;Cf aafiaanonm – 21
‘¥.EEN&&LORE cxrz
. RESFGNDEHT
C”CC>C”knr 32:: r. SEBHAGIRI ass M ADVGCATE]
THIS 5?? FILED FRBYING T0 QUASH TEE
INTERIM GRDER BATEE:1l.¢3.20D’? ON THE FILE
E//,
Jul” ur nnxmawmn HIUH LUUKI §).r,_I$RKNAEAKA mun LUUK! Ur KARNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA MGM COURT OF KARNATAKA H16!-I COURT
0? cxrx cxvrn JUDGE, aausanaaz IN o.s;§a;
1?20f2G0? VIDE ANNExUaE a ANB CflNSEQBEN$LE_IA
TO ALLOW IIAJNQIZ AHD DIREGT=_ THE v =
RESPQEDERT ~ PLAINTIFF we ,2A$_*,wHE %.
DEFICIENT STAMF HUT? ox nccuugmw QB $owEa’
Of’ ATTQENEY ..
T315 w.1.=. COMING5E!§I s””r:.g” PRE:t;;’§~1i:,:~ta§:.nr’%
HEARING THIS nay, ram wcouam =MEhE_ T33
?GLLGWING:- *» H, ‘«. e
Heard tn; _1ga£néa -¢apfis§1 for the
parties.
233 _I$ t§i5* H;it petition under
fisxticleé the Ccmstitutien
___c»f }’.:if:id3:a, pie;-titionua-at has called in
yards: dated 11.04.2007 passed
}::fi-“* t hevv’ti#’ia;§:= ?:eurt in (LS. Ix?-:».1720!’2£}0”? on
Vf,4’I.A.flRD}:i;
‘=3j The patitioner filed. I.A. No.:I
VT _ ‘un'<::Ier Section 33 of the Karnataka Stam
"Act 2!». Section 151 of C.P.C. praying to
OUR'? OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT UGFV-LKARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAIM HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH. COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
impeund the dmcument and proceedwCifiO
accordance with law.
31 The trial cnurt~~by jit§*§¢£c§:’
dated 11.94.2001 has Vr$j駧§dvt§§C_é§iQ»C
appliwatimn.
5] aggrieved by tfiét;;fh§ péiitioner
herein has filed this fifiiifgghigifin.
6} Ihéx_i:¢ar§§&, acéunsfii far the
peti ti cram: Wtzhe tri £13. caurt
was fiot’O’jfi$£ifi§d;OCin rejecting the
appli¢ati@n§* fig Ofiaé7 also submitted that
j the gkifil gofift fits erred in balding that
Otfié$§m§fifi§fi% falls under Article 41(£; of
–‘_O_ th%AO:Kgrfi%t#xa Stamp act. He also
-,fCt§uhmit£§5. that having regard. to the
4:§$§afiings cf tbs parties, the documant
OC_sq£arely falls under Article d1[e} of the
Owfiarnataka Stamp Act and therefore, the
V..
uunl vr ixnunnialxn rm.:I1 LUUKI 9.1- ,:sAKNAl’AKA HIGH COURI or KARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA met-1 COURT or XARNATAKA men COURT
impugned order cannot am: he .sustaineci’=_ ‘i:1~’–_
5/ ‘V
law.
?] As againgt thi§, _§flé 1éérn§fi ?
counsel for the respenfigzgzzt
the trial court Ct.’:’:#.1.1.’?;.vv:li,’§Z%ABJV’A.’:vV~’:l3l’l.T..’i.£I>2J.
the :natura of tfié 7¢Q%§Q$fit{aUhag rightly
held that vt;_}’1e__’ falls
unthr Artéuz: _ ‘Q 1′;f:§;V;Vg’.”;_}¥1ata}:a star»;
Act anti” and therefore,
the i§uqnéfi §§&é% _fi§ea not call for
interf§r%§se;r , k
‘A — iE2§,vu carafully canaidared the
3§hfi£s$i§§e fiéde by tha parties.
AA _9] _. ‘The paint that arises for my
Tgfiafis-isfieration is, whether the iznpugned
1 vx$er aalls for interference ?
10} It is zrelavant to nate, the suit
is in: declaration. The plaintiff i.e.,
V.