Sri Narayan Reddy vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 January, 2009

~ W-'* * Mwwvfi.  mnnavmnflnfl mmzfl %...;UU§{'k" (3? KARNKKAKA HIGH CQURT OF %{ARN%?Afi(A MEGH CQURT G ECARNATAKA HHGH CQUE

23 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAICA AT BANGALORE

Damn '11-ns am 23:2: my 0? JANUARY 

BEFORE

T1-E HOIFBLE Mr. JUSTICE   A {   "  

 

mnnmmnaxnnv
sic Gumrmnnnnr 
mm sBou't74mm:gs,  %
335150.195, 1owc£=IJ3$;.   
BA!lGAL0REV68.    .V 

By ms s ea'r;-'x§3:;j;;;£nv<§cA<£*Ej':  if  x 

D '9'F  Am
ll.B.BI3fl;Dm'G.-_
$3.-ma-AI.c':ms'1.~

Cféma
2 ,  Beam, BYITS



V   PAflA'l'EI)1I.fiG,

'zi1iura'$aI31tea now.

A *»aa1§maI..91m 2.

'I:é3;, :s1=xx:aL mmzrm comuzemnm

A' '  KAEATAKA mmrmmam

 DEVEI.-filIETBOAR'D

V'  msgmmmm ramarnrmms,

KRHPRIHUNGA R0333,
BANGMDRB 2.

THE SPE¢IfiL LAKE !a.OQ!Il$1!Cfl OFYIZRIR
'IRE KfiRR'.fi'l3.KA E ARXA
DEV3LD%T BOARD

GAHDHIHAGRR,



....m »...Wm__ W wsunaw-unnfl mmrn mgwuul up mnmmm Him-§ cmulrr cw KAWMMA mar: cmm W mmmmm Him; com

BERG-ALORB 9.  nwmmm

By %:K.KBfiAVfi RRIJIIY, AGA FOR R1; 331
P.V.CHAHD".lh\%EKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 T0 34)

mm w.P. 13 mm UIIDER Mmczm me 15:11:' 221 on?  _
ma CO1IS'I1'I'U'IIO1iI or mm Emma To n.I:a:e+zf=-'1'5n= ' _
nwnnmm To my mu cowmaamn  er . "
ms mm: Bums 32.30. as zamstmmez 4 *acnm_=_.'-wk
cmmxs or KELLORAHALJJ muss, x.g.*% *1a<;_tm,;t, «
ameaxom aotrra mwx, wmsmflm  'm.1~.1;z;:j
mman-an '10 mm mrmmn BY * onmgma mm 

mmmx mt 23.5.2093 vmE.5.m§nxum.'n, 

This up coming' an     this

 

Mr.ma»~aa.aay.  in dimctaad to
tales notice     V

2.  in listed for prenmixmy

»   china in be the cmmn of the
V  _   at' 4- acres 38 guntaa in $010.80 of
  vinage, K.R.P'umm I-Iobli, aangaxm South

  claim that it um grantad in 1&3 man: by the
  an 15.10.1966. Saguvali Chit was aha 'named on
  V17.09.197l. It appears. than was mama diaputze as to

the titb nftha  Hence, he was constrained ta 
K'



W" * '~w'~*'*~¢***\A *,..°~«{.:w' nnnlvaannn mmrrs LUUK! £25' KARNHFAKA HIGH CQURT OF KARMATAKA HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR

file a suit in O.S.Na.2'9'9]O2 an the filo at' First
Addifinazal Civil Judge (8r.I.')z1.), nmgaim Rural 
as agamt the State. The aaid suit is  _

that the petitinmar has title m the   

appears, the said land is  
the petitioner. Hum @121  aivicepy of
which is pauduaad at  at' the
°0mP¢fl'3fi'°n'     Eiwm °fl

23.96.2008

, ?’:f N~;. ~ *

2. fl a am the auitfilad by
the pe1itITonér.__ i’.aa and there in an

by u-3.1 Judge am: if the

is Wm by the mm» the

m mcaaiwtlw amcmnt in:-aspect of
from the acquisition authority.

A 3 ‘ thi rm, 1 am at the viaw am the

timfiar payment armnpmam fitha land in ,7