Sri Narayan Yeshwanth Kapolkar vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 February, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

C§RCU¥T BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED miss THE -125% DAY or ::'EBRUAR5{, zageé 

PRESENT"

THE H()N'BLE IVIvR.JUbA*.'V':a*'I__'I»{3fE . N.F§§1}?g$.ff''IL'~ '' 

'1'?-IE §~{ON'BLE.MR...§Z;¥ST§_§3E"ARALi" 'Nag-ARA;
wR1'f;a;5§EAL  3:Sé_:5»,!: 2006

BETWEEN:

SR1, NESRAYAN Y»ESH'V§fAP£T}'n'£.._;{APO LKLAR
S] 0 YBS.HWANT_  

AGEE 38"':.'_EA.RS,  _  4
MEMBER, 'mLuKA PAFJCHAYATH
i<:HANf-EPUR T}'&L«UE'{~  '-

22; 0, SEEVARGALI ~ 

 ~fiEL-i}AU,M DVISTRICT; ""   APPELLz'sN'i'

 (EV: SR! :§'€§H}{f~E:[§}f§AKANTH.R.GGULAY, ADV)

AZ\.E D__ 

  '1*1~a'»"«.:" STATE GE' KARNATAKA

V n  ITS SECRETARY
" V i3*EP1~'xR'}'ME3N"F OF RSRAL DEVELGPMENT
V '*--,:'.ND PANCHAYAT RAJ
M.S.BUILDING
BANGALORE « 560 901.



2, THE CHIEF EXECUTEVE OFFICER
ZILLA PANCHAYATH OFFICER
BELGAUM.

3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
TALUK PANCHAYATPE
KHANAPUR TALUK
KHANAPUR
BELGAUM DISTRICT.

 ' ..  agm:%%%  ; T 7

(BY SR1 : R.K.HATTI, HCGP)  

*r}:;':'sV ._A§aa%Rz*fii;:.;V'A1:»z9g:AL "'::*:v:;,i~;ia U18 4 OF 'mg
KARNATAKA :%1'Ix:3~H_ "£?O{Jli'*£f.__z':C['£' PRAYING TO SET ASiDE
THE éabga % :.'Ass£+:.Ij1--.._'..:N THE Wm' PEZ'I'i'I'I€);'~E
No.;.1949~;2uG=HT F'€')R.I}$¥ THE WRIT PETITWN.

" T1§:is--x§}'9IT APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARENG THIS

rj«;Qrv?*£a:,_E":...JUs'r:cE N.K.PA'I'IL, BELIVERED THE

  ' "

JUDGMENT

” AA writ. aggpeal is flied. against the refusal ef the

— order by the iearnsd Singlfi Judge by his order fiatfid

“‘5<:} 3«09.2096 in w,p.Ne,1. 9/ 2005,

2, 'I'0day, learned counsel appearing _ ¥i:)r

submitted that, the writ petition ¥:;E:.s._Ve

petitioner/ appellant herein is diSInf,SS€i3 tin:

Singie Judge on 12.9:3,2008.=’_ ~..__ %

3. In View of the ~ petitimza
itself, We are 0f the does net
survive for filed by the
appellant jiié became infructuous
msewing Emmy. fifi=’:t;i’r::S:vs his grievance
befom the i$ so advised or nmd
3I’iS€S. Ordered. ” fl ‘

I’ …..

Tuéfié

w}

y§’:g&g’§