IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT _
mm!) runs 111:: 24" my on Iumcu. F
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTIOE' N;K,F'OAT!L:AV:::' A
1.I.I12_I1' 11.111195 uo,9g;2 lC¥r_!;l.-'I.¥li3§1L""j:TA.T:V':~
BETWEEN: T I A T I F
SR! NARAYANAPPA
sro. GANG-APPA , T'
59%? .&B9P.T5.3. YEARS T' 2
WAT NO. 36I'lU'II1 ' ' '
THANISANDRA
AIHAID I"\l"lI I l1'l'\E' V
HHHD LaI\JL|«"u.T.-53E l"'\-K30! ' -
BANGAL03E----f36_0045, _ L
T' _ ...PETlTlONER
(By an ; H1t§_LéELgRb:¥a;§§2 3; .. T '
AND;
1 Aé..~'siS*rAri':*Exu*'**¢t:uTivE'ENé;NEEfi
E-a,._sua ouvasecsu' T " '
aescca.-. . . A.
, -BANGALORE -V 'L
-' - 2 VGENERAL MAN e55R(ELEc} (ca. M)
' , ' &.FIRS'I' APPELLATE AUTHORITY
BANGALORE SOUTH CIRCLE
FBEQGOM j..
" %«BA¢4Ge\LoRE;
fiE$F'('.'«|NfJENT§
' ', IIEL. 5.: .~ u A: Il'!l'I'A Al'\ll.l"\J\A'l'I!!\
.. [my all . £3 fl:\.'.|!Jl"|f'\. HI-Ivu.n..nnI:;
iifi'
_ * THIS WRIT PETITEON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
" THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE
-«R2 DT. 11.5.2007 DIEMISSING THE APPEAL FiLED BY THE PETITIONER
HEREIN IN RESPECT OF BACK BILLING FOR THE PETITIONER UNDER
ANNEXURE A; QUASH THE NOTICE OF THE R1 DT. 26.5.2007 CALLING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.9Bl3J2007
i--- 19--- Ivvfiff C01 l'I'\liln'\I'! I)' .lI')I.'TA'I"AI.F1I IT
2
UPON THE .9 .. !'!'!O.N'.F.R TO PAY THE REMAINING BALANCE OF RS.59.910f-
TOGETHER WITH INTEREST FOR 6 MONTHS OF RS.13,573I- WHHEN
DAYS F. --M THE DATE OF THE ORDER UNDER ANNEXURE H. V 3
ms wen" PETITION comiue on FOR PeEuMmARv.~H.e;se§i&e.;~ 3941" ..
'e' eeoup, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE Ti-iIT. mtowiisic; ~ % ' 1. ' .
Petitioner in this pefiticn4_hae'--e_ought
the order dated 11'" Oioeering
No.eME:ocM(Fec)/Jeezzotjs-oeie?53--57 by
second r-'pendent *.%rs.".exure * A an
I3.
1!'!
coneequentipi May 26"?'
issued, H.
the in the instant writ
petition ie - 'Jigiiance Squad
Aivipremiees of the land bearing Survey
of Hegde Negar, Thenieandre on
1999 end wand that. twe eucmereihie
motozreihaving the capacity of 5 H9 and 4 HP were
in the bore welt are running without meters and
" Whey are directly connected to the secondary lines
/
7""
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT EANGAL ' RF. 'W'.T'.'I\io.§iii "u'2""'7
existing in front of the house of the_ petitioner through
overhead lin nd that, they are illegally lifting:~t.*ie_
from the bore wells for the ,oI_Irpoee- of V
'orioi-:s. fineeordingiy. they ohsewed
electrical energy and ttierefcre, subrnitteai ;
On the basis of the said iv/Vigilance
1 .
-Squad, bak billing ne;ioe.'"asV?{.iss';ied the peti"uo'-uer.
Assaiiina fi'1e ttfjeill hilling notice.
I petitioner l the second
respondent._'Vand :fi%e-- by petitioner had
come the eppeiietae eutherfiy
on 11*’ The appellate authority. after
., naarii,g¢ellmp the appeal by upholdingthe beck
t. the paitioner. Being aggrieved
: _ oitier passed by the second respondent
Vappelilate authority and the consequential demand
issued vide Annexure H, petitioner herein felt
/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.’No.98l 212007
neiteted to present the instant writ petition. seeking,
appropriate reliefs, as stated supra.
petitioner and learned standing ..’V
respondents. _ V V _ I
4. After careful perusal the
order that, the eppeiiate an error
of low end” to pose the
a 1..
tmnugnee eutttorityi
finding___as to theft has occurred’ in
spy. The specific one of petitioner
SI HI! IIII II-J UUFVH I-I I35, I VI-Ii II Ill
e”*h~**h- me that he 3 M* “\-
‘ _ownei’-of jibearing Survey No.1’f)1 and is the owner of
12% e.n’d:thet, he has not mis-utilized the electricity
the water for manufacture of bricks and one
\ D -n..:………
auu. v.r\.umu
I
i
it
r
i
E
fifl A
I33 UUI’I II I II”
7*”
/
IN THE HIGH GOURT on KARNATAJCA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.98I 2/2097
eieotrioity for manufacture of bricks and therefae. .i”1e_ is
liable to pay the back billing charges. The
and submission made by petitioner .,
the land and the pump- eete/’er_e by by ,
that petitioner took tempor§rtf:__ after
deteetlon of theft of \_.!$i’ia.-ta eta.-ft.
T’ne appeiiatev error in not
clarifying the of electricity
has mkanplfgace :to.e1o1rorbsy.No. 102 or in reenect
…. t-.-it… .. exact etswet-r_ fii.i”f5ufii’.
.1:
::.r
5»
EL
3
W
E
an
or.
F1I’
reoord1vspeoifio”finVc;!ing_see”nto whether Sy.No.101 belongs
” or ” “”” ‘Further. it was the case of petitioner
thettappauam uthority mat, the um bearing
cg Li-
v:.’.Iy.e..\_|u.
161 ,irTtf’Thenieeno’r* ‘v’iiiege beionge to one Smt.
and she has in turn executed a lease in
A War of one Sri. V.R. Thirupal for manufacture of briclce
“end the on ‘ iener is on th
1 u’ far-an-II-I II I I Illll lull
at-.=ne.-‘ of the said Survey
/::L–r–
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.PNo.98l1!I10D7
no-mber. These two epecific grounds taken by petitioner
in their memorandum of appeal have not ”
into nor considered in proper it
appell.e_e e..It.herit\,t. Furlhe.”, is
‘L ‘t, in the criminal case registered l
in Special c.C.No.383/2002
City Sessions Judg~’¢;:–..§;- _ charge
had bee”. file;f- ag-aan¥a%»e the alleged
offences in 39-A, 40, 41
and 44 orlnow: with Section 379 of
IPC ewe pppelace, wee:-.sr l— been
ac-quittee’, rifter trial. Therefore, the
– petitioner has not been looked
nor discussed by assigning. cogent
reeeonei V. .!-_’l-%.;rI.e.-5, in View of non o”o’u’r’:t of proper
r ‘A4..’_lehquiry” and for not passing. a speaking order, the
i order passed by the appellate authority cannot
j » ibeuéeuetained and therefore, it is lieue m be ….t asses on
¢€~___.
I
‘1’” “”riE HTH “”‘-‘ TOP KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.98lif20l}7
this ground alone without going into further merits of
0366.
5. lo the !ig..t or the fe..–… and aim we 3
case, as stated above, the petition hy
is disposed of as follows: _ 2
I} The writ petition Afil.ié§iv:_b3′-…PBti9fioner
I A.
allowed in pa…
“1 bv
second authority dated
11″‘ negating A ue;eeueIEeM (F e
vide Annexure A
and “V ooneequential demand
_ deted1’26*’lVMa-y 2007 hearing No.E-
A “fitnnexure re hereby set aside;
A. it lli] Matter stands remitted back to the
l “competent appellate authority constituted by
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.’No.98l 212007
1.!
Circuiari guidaiin, 3 diracuafi :6 r
consider the matter afresh and to ..
appropriate decision, in aocordana’ ‘ H
petitioner and in consona_nce:’irafl|%h–zti1e n ‘
Supply Code which is apfirmauefi
of petitioner, as
e3cr)éd”rtior.rs5y__§s 2 V
judge
IN THE HIGH com or KARNATAICA AT BANGALORE W.P.!~io.9Ei2ii53!DD’T