High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri.O.Ganeshan vs Union Of India on 31 August, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri.O.Ganeshan vs Union Of India on 31 August, 2010
Author: Ravi Malimath


IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT s;é;NG;gt_jj _

DATED Tl-{ES THE 3157 DAY OF Au.euSfT~.,2oi0«.A ”

THE HON’BLE MR.Ju ‘sTf:1:CE,vRAyi–rs§A’LiM2tTH

WRIT PET:T1o”N’ i§_.’io.”3o.§:;i5 V’i2.Q’0–9(G M-RES)

Sri O.Gan.esij_an ‘ _ ,_

Aged.-ab.o,Lit~-.38″years-,_

S/0aOvu Retidiyadyr, _ –

Residing at 1O,’.i-»,..,4SriVrarir1’a Nilaya,

Serpentine Roa_d,—.,K.1Jn”e-ar”Park West,

Bangalore 9*-.560. o’2.0′.»__..’~ …PETITIONER

{fig Sri IQ.B.v§ati.sV{f}_,’éAdvocate–absent)

Un-ioniéofilndia

Represented by its Secretary,
Department of Road Transport 8:

A’ Highways, New Delhi.

“2.”AThe Nationai Highway Authority of Endia

Ministry of Road Transport &
Highways, (35, & 6, Sector 10,
Dwaraka, New Deihi ~« 110 075
Represented by its Chairman.

rte?

3. The Project Director

Nationai Highway Authority

Of India, Ministry of Road Transport 8:
Highways, Govt. of India,

Corridor Maintenance Unit,

22″” K.M. of NH7, Bommasandar,
Bangaiore.

4. Genera! Manager & Project Director I
Nationai Highway Authority Qt’ India, ‘7 v ‘
PIU, #1573, “B’ Biock, ‘
Behind Electric Sub-Station,

Sahakara Nagara, ‘
Bangalore — 560 092. A A

5. AARVEE Associates-,_ _
Ravuia Residency,’ ‘ ‘
Srinagar Coiony,

Hyderabad’-‘”.__82.:”

6. i<.ri.R;coristructici-i.,_Lid~;
HavEn_gdi"{,eg'd. off: "

,-#6–3–63_5,’3’7″” Fioor, Akash Ganga,
~ Knaita ra ha-d.,,V_Hygdera bad,

A»–n’cih”ra Pradesh.

Ofr’ir;e.~ at:

Arur’_”‘./iiiage, Ni-£7
Mandikai Hobii,
” .C’hiVkkabaiiapur Taiuk & District. …RESPONDEi\iTS

C’ ‘(i3y Pi/s.Singhania & Partners, Advocates for R2,3,4
T ” = Stanciing Counsel, for R1, –R5 8: R6–Served)

>ii<

This Writ Petition is fiieci under Articies 226 8: 227 of
the Constitution of India praying to quash the

V/<–

communication dated 4.8.2009, vide

request of the petitioner for formation of the sen/i’cer*r.Qiad’

has been rejectectetc.

This Writ Petition coming::.’_oni-for3pételiminaf’,?::”rhe’a:r_iing ‘

in ‘B’ group this day, the court ma_de_the foivi_-ny’ving:–‘:\’
None appearszijfor thenoe’ti._ti.on~–er, evenflvthough the
matter was caiied on This petition is

dismissed f0″‘”~9iriwpt0seciu~tio’n.A.”