High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Parthalingappa @ … vs Sri Javid Bhasha on 25 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Parthalingappa @ … vs Sri Javid Bhasha on 25 May, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan


{N MVC N02202/2006 QN THE FILE OF’ AD{)I’F1QN__AL

JUDGE, MEMBER, MACH’, COURT cm SMALL c;_;:_._:s:§;s.,_

BANGALQRE, SCf.CH–5, PARTLY ALLOWING
PP1’I’i”I’}(}N F011.’ C:OMPENSATi{)N ANQ’_”‘*-..s,§;§;KIF:N<i;'

ENHANCEMENT F012 COMPENSA'E'I'fJ?&–..A

'mas APPEAL CQMINQ ON 1§'GR HEiX;x"§IAi\fG'~'I;£;f.§S. "

BAY, THE comm nELIvERE::";§*1r.1§_ia: F'C}LLOW:£v!$€G:__ ""VV

. j' 1" — . ._

Heard bgth is by the
Claimant '£:§f= fiafifiansafion and
the VA i:3f counsel for the
has f:1'I'£3(i in not
aWa1'd!i::g under the heads af

medical eXf3(:r';$es§ 1933 of earning capacity.

regards this submimion, Ieazned

c:oi;1:91se} 'f%:;' file insuraxlce campany argued that the

£fi1j1;r£;a§ has awarded adequate compensatien undsr

1/ 1.11' " head 3:" less of futura eatnhlg capacity talgjng the

§§':Co:11e at Rs.3,{}€}O/- per Irmrzth and as far as

medical expenses head is cencemed, Rs3?,OiZ}O/– is