I-Aged. abaiit years,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DATED THIS THE 03% DAY OF' SEPTEMBER 17¢}; a V
BE? ORE
THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE'H.BéILLAf':E§'§,.
MFA.No.7318/2o1b«.(¢?C)
BETWEEN:
Sn'.Prakash V.Jai1'1,
S/o.late Vijay Raj Jain,
Aged about 38 years, -. V g
R/a.No.208, 2nd Floor,
Flat No.202, 3"' '
Chamarajpet, 4. {E '
Bangalore ----560 '
[By sr1.B.R;Viéw¢%§¢atf§§E§V
AND:
---......_............._
Smt.N.RQopa, ' ~.
W/o.1at.e :fI'.C'.~Suresh'.--~ . __
N'=:,>:39:,"1§§ 1V{ain',«..K;v€3.Road,
Bangalore
***$**
[By SI'i;A._VRavm* Adv. for C / R.)
L/
. . .APPELLANT
. . . RESPONDENT
é This MFA is filed u/0.43 R.1(r] of cpc, against the
“A7_”.,_;orde14?df.I0-8-2010, passed on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.4055/2010
temporary injunction and it has been rejected. Therefore, this
appeal.
6. The learned counsel for the appeii’ant’.ivcontended
that the trial Court was not justified..:’
application. He also submittecllthat the appelliiarit~ha.s-ilbeen.l’
inducted as a tenant and the has” sum of
‘<'.14,00,000/- to one appellant is in
possession and enjoyrnent.'of"thcsuit_ property and
therefore, the l:.V'J§l.lS._.flE_)'t in rejecting the
application.__ the appellant has
produced and Bank pass book to
show his posse-s_sionlll'andl_thlerefore, the Trial Court was not
justified rejecting'theapplication. He, therefore, submitted
-impugned””order cannot be sustained in law.
7.t this, the learned counsel for the
‘””zrespondepnt”submitted that the respondent has entered into
with M/s.Adarsha Shelters Private Limited
respondent has been put in possession and the
4/
Therefore, it is improper to grant injunction in favour of the
appellant. Therefore, the appeal is liable to be
10. Accordingly, the appeal is dismisse_c1_._:i- %
Misc.Cvl.No.13883/2O1O doeisi
consideration and accordingly, it isfrejecihed, ‘
Bss/JS.