Sri R K Gouli vs The Divisional Controller Ksrtc on 7 November, 2008

WP 6697,2008

IN THE HIGH com? 09' KARNATAKEI' % ;;--{i f  .

cmcurr BENCH' AT DHARWAD    A %
DATED THIS THE 7%! mm: <1313é§{)x§3MB¥.§:2:L":i9:;3%:_'_V 'V
8fiF0RE x '  ::.i.'V 
THE Momma MR.JUSTf€:£§"'~.RAM"MQHA?§'.=Ii;i§3;§}§VY'

WRIT PE'I'§'I'I€}%\.'~..§$o.6i$§'7i*i5;Q0:$_;_{£.;-KSR'fC)VA

BETVHEEN:

Sri R.i{.(}ou}i, _ .  ._  § 

Agfl: '?5 years, iI)c;;i1?if§i1t(i',.   
R70: 110,     .  
Tfiakwadi,  ' '   ._   ...Petitioner

{By Sri.  Advocate ~ absent)

AND:

 

 The Diirisjéiial 

 '£«:s~';R'rc,' Béigsilzm Division,
    

.1 . . Respcmdent

_'_a7.s:&rd"s1iitab1y and pm-party so as to award bZiOG"/E: backwages

 Court made the following: :% 14K

This Writ petition coming cm for orders this day, the



WP 6697,2008

ORDER

T1113 Writ petition was film?! K x

Registry noticed objections and g1;-éni£–: < iT

comply with the same. nof co,a3?,;}V.'i»i¢A(i{ 'v»*it11"j the * V L'

objections, the matter__ was 'b_§:fo::;i%: " on
14.10.2008 when twfi)I;:;:"eck«:aL. «granted, despite
Which, as on today, #3 such. Today,
there is when the case

was called 01:-,cv:é-.i:,:i.,t}1e matftiing' bnce in the afiamoon.

Petition is di€;'miss¢d:…' ,

sd/..

…..

Kmsf”