1 1 VN-'.P.33(}4:iw48f()') IN THE FHGH COURT OF KABNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 15?" DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRJUSTECE H.N.NAGAMOHA.é*é--»!:5_j1"§SV"-11: ._ WRJT PETITION NO:33o44~A8/zébogfiLTB;5;E§j'._' " 'V, E Oi' BETWEEN: SRJRSUBRAMANYA S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAHM " - ' AGED 52 YEARS, _ O BEHJND SRi CHENNAKESI1AVARASV§.fAf\.43~'. TEMPLE BELUR TOWN, H.ASSAN~Di.ST- ' W SR:.Em;AAEAL'L,a'kAE;;J~LJN*O O S/O [;ATE RA'?JEAKR"I.SH~NA~:AH. ; AOED~.40'--YEARs,.j-»._ _ _ BEHJND SPACHANNKESH/WARASWAMY TEMPLE, BELUR TO.wN HASSANDTST. sRi%f_AET'.R.AJAsETEa<HAR . srO"LATE PAMAKRISHNAIAH . 'AGED_v4?.'{EARS, _ "BE'f--':i.NE._SR§" OHANNT<EsHAvARAswAAAY TEMPLE, " _BE_LUFi'"F'QWN;',"HASSAN DiST. sNzT.O.EEETN'A W/O T.AT§_E RAJASHEKHAR .AGED'4D YEARS, O VBVE'%-HND SR! CHANNKESHAVARASWAMY TEMPLE, --..E3*ELE.ER TOWN, HASSAN DIST. a"'»M (By Sri.N R NAII4" ,5) 2 \'v'.§'.33{H4--iS/{)9 SRI.B.R.SUBHASH SIO LATE DRRAMACHANDFRA AGED 40 YEARS, BEHIND SR: CHANNKESHAVARASWAMY TEMPLE" I ;...: Cf' .»_. A BELUR TOWN, HASSAN DIST. " STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY « REVENUE DEPARTMENT _ M.S.BUIL.DINOS BANGALORE THE DEPUTY':CCiMM:S:SION'ER_éé§ CR'A.'IRIvfAN FOR DISTRfCT..TO'U'BISM}-DE'\!E'LO'i?JVIE'NT COMMITTEE, 'i.'..-_!/{S SAN DIS1', RASSAN THE A.SS':S'TAN'T'OOMMISTS'IO_N ER SAKALESRPU RA SUB D':---\/_iS«fO%\i, SAKALESHP"U.RA' TA.l§}ISJL'DARg S'"E-LUR HASSAN DIST. A TIELCIJNICVAL DFRECTOR _ "'DEPART_r\/i»E'N,_T 'OI: LAND SURVEY " ._AN__D. SET"ILE£\¥/f'ENT, BELUR TQ_, THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOURISM DEPARTMENT _RASSA.N DIST. " IT-IAECHIEP OFFECER 'TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .. _ BELUR, HASSAN DIST. 4 'M' 3 \V'.?'__'C{)~H--4?_Ar~' R/A MARLE HOSAKOTE VILLAGE, ' ' AMBLE HOBLI, ' _ CHIGKMAGALUR TQ, ' CHICKMAGALUR DFST. " je ,.;-RESRONDENTS (By srI.R.DEvDASS, AGA FOR RI 'TO;Re"& R8 & R9) _ 'V THESE wRITi.PETITIONS'-ARE"FILED LINDER ARTFCLES 225 & 227.TI»IE C@NS"T.I.T'UTION'vOF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET_--AS_1DGEV'THE,NQTlCE DT. 3.11.2009 ISSUED BY THE R4 \/IDE A'NX~.'\/1 AND 'I=AsI4RETGH'ER PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THESE"F?ET%TfO--NER8____ THESE WRTT._RETi.TlO'I\iSzOOMlNG ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAV, THRCOURT MAeE_T_RE FOLLOWFNG; ORDER
Ski”:-R.D«e\io’a’ss., AGA és directed to take notice for Respondent
it it to 6 and-‘Respondent Nos.8 & 9.
H in these writ petitions, the petitioners have prayed for a
‘ virrit iriuthe rzatuzre of certiorari to quash the notice dated 03.31.2009
4 \¥\l}I,§1%{);$4i%!5f(){}
Annexure «M ‘M’ issued by the office of 4″‘ Respondent,/Tahsiidar
directing the petitioners to be present for conducting H
properties beionging to Beiur Sri.Chennakeshavaswamy.’:fTempie’in= —
Sy.No.216/1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and gramathanaSy’.f’J–o:59–‘t2A_tV2:Biiv
3. No prejudice wiii ee”ieeu.e_ed to the .Vp’e:itre.ee~r’ew by
issuing the impugned notice. find no__§uis’ivi.fi_a’b.§_e ground. to jriterfere
with the impugned notice.
4. Accord i.n.g:i.y,’:- their: writ’ _:’..pet«i.tion’$~. uaregf’ hereby rejected
without referenceyto .1eQ’LfiV_ V
5. permitted to file memo of
appearance for to 5 and Respondent Nos.8 & 9
within irveeks rre’mv1re-;s_ey._
set/–
JUDGE
dhf’ ”