(3; Sr; :'§?airé;$£i'1.:ram Rjrlattarakihal Aciv.,)
IN THE HIGH coum 0;» KARNATAKA AT
DATED THIS THE 318'? DAY~{)F4fiU"C§UVS%I,2f5C'§ '¢. A x
BEFORE, a
THE HC)N'BLE MR. JusTiCE;:'A..;4 V3ImGQPALA.;GGWDA " V
WRIT PETYFION. No. 1§3ijQ%0F. 2003" {LB-s}3§MPI
BETWEEN :
3.. Sri.
S/0. M.R;'Ve§}1:ataChe}2ipa§;hy," V'
Ageds;gbo12t_V39-y_ea;t§;..__V'-. '
2. A'
S/39. _ _'
Aged almt
Both .§;i;assk%%2-2/a;;t%:~qt;}%3L2%.%%L&. 32/1,
Bctiappa Lagié', C.".f'.Strmt:,
__ 2;... ..... .. v
PETYHONERS
ANiI)_: '
. V. ' u ' = 'The ifommissioner,
_ B':B.M.P.
. "bF;R.Squa1'e (Birds,
Bangalore.
2. The Adéitional Commissiensr {West},
B.B.M.P
Bhashyam Park,
basis of a registered sale deed dated 10.0
favour. The 431 respondent filed her the
saié application. The 4th respo::ix3efit”
OS.No.732/()7 in the ei::j~;;ze,%e;vi1 €3<::1H*t, e_:"E§é;1*1géi1ore,""
wherein by an order paee'ed _en é'IA;-Neel dated
03.01.2008, ixltezrim am was vacated.
2. “peizitioners is that,
respendeiie vnot: considered the
appfieeeiee__at Annexure —~ G despite they
approaehilig “%_ee.fi.)ondente repeatedly in the
mafifgey, ‘4 V ‘
“‘-Ramanjaneyagowéa, iearned counsel
ei’;:;;§eeri:§£gjV’V}’£}r.e:;respendent Nos. 1 to 3 submitted that, the
“._’»app1ic;3fi<3n ef the petitioners, as at Annexure — C} will be
"« 'iI.:¢;
of two months fiom the data p};’oduce a
copy of this order.
All €r..:$VfJ and thze 461
re$pendeIit.,.V 2::té;__Iéfi_ for {he decision by the
CO1}1ptf;t€I}t_A£i{if?§7]VO:{fii'”i§? of
0rd7e:1§:dv.a(:<:f3fc}.ii";g.%j!,
Sd/-
JUDGE