Sri Raja Shekar vs Mrs Shuba Priya on 19 March, 2009

-42:»

THIS CRLR. P. 18 FILED ms. 397 r/W 401 cR.:§1¢§’:’§R§:E:rag

TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT 0:2′ CONVICETION Am sfiéfrfirfmj
PASSED 3? THE xxx ACMM, B’LORE cm, ;N…c.’c.;:e;;sa61;VG5.,,

I)’}’.31/’3/06 AND FURTHER ‘ms y:>E1):::2¢_ ?As,s.§§13′.._I3y._1’A«q’;§;*a*

Ai)DL.S.J., AND R0. PFC-ii, ‘B ‘Lc=:’RE,’ ‘£>’i’;:2;6;§}.fii_e–;,”:’T1.;1~:

CRL.A.NO. I015/O6.

THES PETITION COMING “FOR ADM1ssI’a:n§i”=.ffiiis’V DAY,

COURT MADE THE FOLLOW_i N:G:_ ‘V ”

§)etitioi1er has filed a memo
praying <, to d;%smiga.% as withdrawn. The said
memo is oil

.th<:~ revision petition is dismissed as

5d/*?'!,.

Ezlége

T *1:1ir’s–..