1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 30*" DAY OF JULY DA BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE _Fvt1'§\_i-II-:P-1%'
BETWEEN:
1) RAJASEKfic3′
S/QDvLATE’iV’5;.EU<A5?3TRAQ…V
AGED' 45 G.CC:AG_f{ICUL'mRE
R/O.VIL.Lfi.-GEAHQK§iANA-B,
mwx & DIS1'.._BIDAR
2)MAHADEv1_
4;: 3/0 !.AT”E..§4EELKAH’l’RAO
veto ANflARf«e3–«RAMPURE
* DAC3€2C:., HQHSEHOID GAGRICULTURE
. RIO” DONGARGAON
‘rA_LU:(& DIST. GULDARGA
3) KAMLAVAH
” _ D/D LATE neeaxaxmao
V KW/O PR§5HUS§-IETTY ACHI
* AGED 51 was
AGRICULTURE & museuow
R/0 REKDLGI
TALUK & DIST. mmn
4) NIRMALA
D/O LATE NEELKANTRAO
W/O S!-IIVASHAMALPPA CH-ONDE
(By sax s v smsm, ABSENT)
AND:
2
AGED 43 YEARS V
occ: HOUSEHOLE) &AGRICULTUR£ %
R/o NAUBAD % %
TALUK & oxsr. BIDAR
1) MALLAMMA
ALLEGED 2″” wire or &
NEELKANTRAO ” ‘
AGED 53*vEARs %
occ: gaofisenewi Y _ –
R/0, HoKfi;!iNA:-5 ” V
BIDAR ?’rALuK% L
2)3AsA
w/0 GURi§APPA”3A§1M#
AGED
oczz: %Houser~:o:.,D{%k
. _ R/0 VILLAGE
.% TALUK 3; 310».
cHAaimAMr4A
W10 umunmu
AGED
occ::s4ousEHoL9
R./O AIYONALLI
” TALUK cmmmou
= 0151′. GULBARGA
RESPGNDENTS
“-_M.FLA. IS FILED UHGER ORDER #3 RULE 1(7) OF C.P.C.
‘<,PRAYIfiG TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN MISC.
[CASE 30.40/06 DATED 8.6.2007 08 THE FILE OF FAST
TRACK COURT-II, BIDAR, AND ALLOW THE APPEAL.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the court
delivered the fouowing
Lliii
None appears for the appeliants.
2. The appeat is dismissed for ”
vgh*