High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Rajendra S/O Pachaiappan vs Sri Faridsab S Hiremani on 15 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Rajendra S/O Pachaiappan vs Sri Faridsab S Hiremani on 15 October, 2009
Author: N.Ananda
-cu IRII'I I

....... ..5,..3M -.- ..............w.. nluri wax; Ur mmnmm HIGH COURT or I<AmAz"AKA men calm' as xAmA'm<A men cc

IN THE }flGH COURT OF KARKATAKA AT BAR

mmn 'TI-IIS T:-m ism my 01? % 

BEFORE   %
am HGRELE  

SR1 RAJENI3RA,  L
$30 PARCHAIAPPAH,   
AGEB33YEAR_$,     
R! Q 39-9943 s  $333: ' 

181' PHASE4,VMY$€3RE"RQAD,'.  

1.

SR1 fiimmanz,
% 24? – YELBURGA,
” ‘§.§’i.?ELBUR–*’–.3x’
Bxgraiéoppa.

X r::;?i_ Kfim mm A CE ca, £313.,

‘ amfim amcz,
” }’s§;f1§.R§iATAI(A CHAWER
” Q1? ememmacfi Bhmg,
J.T€s.1§&$&§2, H£mL1 -Q3

. % J % – 3? :13 BR&H(}H MAHAGER.
% {BY mm ASSOCIATES, Anvs. ma R«1

am 13.s,mmm1zm.3v. my R-21

ms ma FEED we 173(1) 65* Mv am;
AGAINST TEE JUD<§1»mH'r Aim AWARD mm
mfuizms PASSEE} 33 mm xa.75:35;e4 as 33%
mg C}? Ti-E mm; 3.4.3333 gums} raw

5.63-E C0113'? Q!' IJKARNATAKA HIGH OF KARKATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA FIIGH C063!' Ur SKAKNIHAIRA ruun nu

mm-V, METROPQLYFAN AREA, BANGALORE (Seca-
5}, PARTLY A.LLOW}1'~IG Tim CLAM W'{'i'I'I€_32;3_J"-.1?'¢i3R
CBJE’EN$AT1OK mm mama EEC}-IA§QEgIs§EHT’;K3F;
cmmmmmmm. _r’Nm%g

ms ma come on E£:>R_AB’r§fiS.9?”;%ig£3i~i: *
mm was scrum’ EaELI’2E12En:fI°£m4;4′;32;’;,c;:rm1«:¢_;..=V_%L ‘ J }
Jgn§Mg§wfi_{k[
ocvmant ef Co:;:1§é.§ taimzx up for
far mt ef

” ; ” i~iea rd.’ _ fined Coumel fer cia2mn’ t

$2-gm Cleanse}. far Imumm

rewards mu} avidenm sf F§F»3,

_ -1:

z W7 HF-:

A _ had sufiemfi mmiauted fracmzm of skmfi: esf
% am and am we. mm’ am simple i11junea.’ .

Tm fiacmm wws rfiuwci by «spa; raéuction and
inmnal ficafiexz. 33 pa’ midi zzf I-“W-3 Br.Rav£sh.,

swam aim’ mmpiete aeamaent, @ £ $ufi’m*a/flfixcsm

§’\? k ‘ -‘\.,… L W

Hrwfllil wwuiaun wan: I\p1u\I’Il’iIA”u$l”n illiill wr I\#\!§%”§QIP\l\nf’\ “K,” UUUKI UP

t physiml af right mm» limb

dimamiay with mfialmzw tn wlwle body is ammsed-”
10% The «gamut has mamima PW-2 A

pram that he was worlnfi $3 a ksiasgjn
mlary of Ra.’7,000l-. Apart mm

otlmr amumem are gnducw
mm. mm mm to WWW
avidmm em rmrd, has of

1) Painfis Ra.3o,<'m;~
2} Medicrai mam % [M % Rs.4a,mm_:~
3} Lws :3-f pwiod Rs. 9,000/-

4§" &
mg :31' Ra,5'!»,Qmi –

Ra.w,cm;-

‘ Iwrtitiie CflHfi%I fiarr pm-aw’

‘ I am sf ‘dim cpitrion

V tim awarded mi-dz ‘low of amnitiw’

g mzmmvm-mass mafia had su.fi’e:re<i

– – — fiactuaf both ‘éarmm affiht Iawsxj fimh

{GE-§ COURT OF KAFQNATAKA H’GI’I §_:€3§i}_;RT OF KARNATAKA HIGH CGIRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURI OF !£A!(!\EAIAlu\ taut: uuum wr nnnunannn nun. …-..

“me aompensatinn awaréw. unsim the hand ‘bag of
mings during laid up period’ a
mibunal has not awarded ”

‘nnzzrishmzt, mxzveyanoe 2
%ef¢m, I modify the. ‘~
“mm amwm ?”‘%§,m,-

amedimz     Rs.4o,w3;»
3} Lwa    R:s.18,€}fi€¥[-

 

future    % Rs.54,G€wi-

5) 1.oas    Ra.3a,aoa9_(
5} Iffumre   R3.1fl,,00fi]

 T  shargw I~2s.m,eo<3;-

A$ t is mfifleé. ts fatal eamgarmfinn of

g u§:m,§2{§m;w,

6,It1t11erwu1t,Ipawt1’nefoEewi1garz:ie:r:
The 3%} is amepted in mm; Tm

award 7m madfied, Ccmpenmtzimz cf R$.1,S®,0€}p{- 1

VIII

EGH GOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KAKNAIAIUI. mun nuulu ur nnxmenunnn ruun u

awardaé. by the Ttribmml ‘E mhanced to Ra.1,92,G€}0/-

with iI1t&1″1%’£ at 6% psa. fium the date sf

date of realisaticsn. The payment and VV _

he in the ratio evolved in the V

arefitedtsbeartkmeircpam

gd/.2
‘ JUDGE