High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Rajesh @ Raju vs State Of Karnataka By Indiranagar … on 10 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri Rajesh @ Raju vs State Of Karnataka By Indiranagar … on 10 June, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
IN THE EQGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAL{§i%E

DATEEJ THIS THE: 10% DAY (212 JUNE,   ~ 

BEFORE  Q
THE H{Z)N'BLE MR.JUS'I'i{3Ei 'S"{!EHA'SH.;Vfi ,f%§Z>;VVV:V   
CRIMENAL PETETIQN  «.  
BETWEEN: V»  A. 1 'V

Smfiajctfih {Q3} Raju 
S/0 Muttappa Masai V
39 yrs, 1;! a 53* Crass, .
Virajanagar V    v
Bammanahafii, éfiosur Iféeatl' '~ 

Baflgalam  " ~ ,. . Fsijtionsr

H " =  _  "C_'3§:3"1"1s:%.:sIit§ Acivi}

State of Kéim.a¥:aka'._ A ._
By Ig1:fi:'a11agaI~ Efolicc Staijon
Rep "§:>yE i:_3;1t.: Stats P  Prosmruter

  " High c¢z_m,o§_;<a:nata1:a
 '   AV '   Reapandent

(By Sri Satish R' Girjji, HCGP}

'V " fI'ixis #t:11'mina3 peiition is filsd under Secticn 439
 {3r.P,{3..-... "praying tit) enlarge the peiitianer on bail in

"S.tT3';.3'§%9.992[2(}()5 new pending before the Fast Track

 -Sezzfiéfiilims Judge V, Bangalcrre city which is re§'s.te:::*ed for the

 crffence punishable undar Section 396, 1288 of IPC.



This criminai pciiiian coming on for  _
t1:u==: Court made the follawingt   ~ % _ 1

The: pfititioner is accusgd ' 
rtgistcrcd against thc: p<ititi€§n,§*..  on "
16-5-2005

for the ofi”6nf:cs u:r.id§:rv..Scr:::§i:i011 802
IPC. Though inifialijé .Ca=’s-5?, in crime
No. 19212005 o:; 15_–5-2(}{§5- ;p§n:.sha2a1c Lmdezr

Scicijtizm 302 $11b:§¢qfi3c:3.fly ii registered far the:

(3fi’€I1C€v}§)}}I3iSh’?§i);:*?S: _1;1′:f:§5§’,:.s€3Cfi£é§f1§$.:§39§ r/W 1268 {P6, 021
investigatimis ‘ charge shed: and petitioner
was axmsiérqi an than he has been in juciicfiai

C{1S»§§é?&y2 ‘~

2 Govcmmcfli Advocafc was asked to verify

‘.E%?}:€£i1€i’ t¥_3;_e:t__ pcétifioncr was invaived in any ether case. Cm

v¢ri.§§CaSi«E3.1a;*’Er: submits that petitioner was met invelwzci in

a;*’3.f;’_.t3fh:€’I’ crisszzea

Cbargc: Shfifii has hefin filed and izrial has

-~«::f9mm€§<:e:ci§ Hewevfirfi {hare is 3.. daiag in cancitiding the

trial P€t:ii:i0:1er has been in gudicial custody for more than E

four :§5'fi£-1I'S. {Z'i0n.siz:¥c:rin.g {ha Itjlzgth of his }:1:_<:¥'§<<%ia,3i Vc*?ist::$é§–}'

and 3.15:1: ctonsicimijag th.a'{L 110 Case §:}f:3'ldiIIg"

pctitionfiir can bf? finlargeii on bail i$'ub3f§:c3: 4" –.

4. The petiiicvn is aliowad. yi433=C:”§Jfi?ti€i0I§’:€§;”A ‘:53

an bail in Eff-rims: NO§10Q[;2{:’§4’3:I’3~.,bSL1b§€Cf’iffy’

CO§1diti{)I1S:

ii}

% _ {iii}. –

wfip

V ’93::

_ “E’he ‘> sha}1 cxrimate a

‘pe1*:=;…V992f 2005.

pctifioncz’ filial} not tamper with
% “€£;{=.1′ -p’1:o3ec13tim1 1i?itf1fl&SS€$.

‘i_.f%,€’ ;:;$tjfi~:m.€r shall a4t.t::*:11d ihs Couri;
r%’gj:sia:’-iy.

pctifiszsrisr $213.3} mark his
attcladamrc (met: £11 153 {lays Eyfifora
j1fsr2’s::}.ictienai §}<:,:.iic<% giatisznz. beziwasn
1{1'n{}{} am. tr; 3.3%") pm. preféarably
on Sunday.

Sd/-

Judge