Sri Ramappa vs State Of Karnataka on 27 May, 2008

IN was HIGH C0331 or xnanamaxa a:_$a§a3;b§fi"*f
DAEED $313 was 2?"'B@&M6F'Mfi¥,fi§§fi&' 'H
2fifisza§   1
ram fi0fl'BLE M. éuafiisz fi;£,'m@fiJ6fi§&fiJ
wag HOR'BLK mks; J6sfi¢fififi}§Q*nAsARAmauA
4  f§U'.A,:;fic:$; 255$;/.Q'¢_e).§  I 
BETWEE:'_HU' kl  _fi V V   u"$
2. c;3,m§nifia§g§§n§ §2§!fiamaiah,
35 Y§ara'._ .V. fl_ .

3. 52-;a:;iyapp  é, 's/It: if.am§.a:r:aha.11i
~*¥B3i?finpa;-Sfimyeara,

¢_»j*a;1u;:g-gig: sigtenahalli,
',' Nana; Kali; Mddenahalli Post,
. chikkabaixapur Dist. .. APPELLANT

"« ($§'a$yo¢ate Sxi.P.N.Nanja Raddy)

'  fltate cf Kaxnatalca,

R/by its Prl. Secretary' ta
The Revenue Depaxtznant,
b£.5.Bu:'.1d:i.ng,

Vidhana Veedhi,
Bang"aJ.ore--3..

2. The Deputy Commissioner,
Chikballapur Dist. Cl1.i.1¢ba.1J.ap1::::~.



2

3. The Deputy Director cf
Public Imstructians,   _
Chikballapux Dist. :
Chikballapur.

4. The Executive Off.i.<:.-.et','~..
Taluk Panchayat, 
Chikballapur Dist.
Chikballapux.

5 . The Tahsildax ,
Chilcballapur .

am; fi'...;:';...._ '«j.s~. _""£;;;e¢i uncles: sec.¢ of The
 _Hig3: a to set aside the ordaers
passed. 3.2; WP ޢ_.1'?0$2}*f;O07 dated 27.11.2907.

; 'fhis   :'Ls canning can for preliminary
hearing' this   IIARJUNAIH J. delivered the

. .  'fqliawiijg:  ~ . A_

JUDGMENT

8e’farc’ifithe counsel for the appellant: and the

Zkivacate fa: R-1 to 3 5 5.

2;; After: arguing the matter at length, auunsel

for the appellants submit;-.5 that as per Anneaxures-5

8′. fl”, appellants have given a xepreaentatien to the

Qrl. Secretary, Revenue Davpartment and the Deputy

82/

4

3. In View of the subm:i_asi9n,V _r:_>’£ izfié”
the appellants, this
withdrawn .’ granting l;i.bertj,-r_ f¢.;t}y_'{ii2¢
pursue their remedy for land
unlit in accordance-;::’_.””fwi’!:’i_; If further
request is by is for the
authorities f«:c’>”‘«T§:;.L’:V6’nsi:.=_<_:1ae.'*_.' Vaacoxdance with

law .

ma.-:m_ ..

R!28G508