High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Rangappa vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Rangappa vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANEIGVGIII  '

Dated: This the 131- day of October 2010
BEF ORE

W.P.N'Gs.2O588-57 1 /20 1IGA~{G.M-E'_E'SIE)VV" " I 1.

BETWEEN I

1.

SR} RANGAPPA, I I W
8/0 LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, ‘W

AGED ABOUT 65
BENEFIT OF SENIORS CITI23E_I’€Si*{.I¢P NOT CLAIMED.
SR1 VENKATAPPA, V I ~
s/0 VENKIIITARAN-GA§PA;– _ «V
AGED A3403; GGYEARS. .,
SR1 cI~11I<';j*I«:p'II~"I'I'x._I\I»LI-II./jI;rII'm:I;'w.
s/0 S-ANJEVAIAH; ~
AGED IIABGUT "5o'"yEARs." I "

SARI NINGA£5P'Af,V.OG
S/O''NANGAPPA, '' ,

_ .AGED'n13GLI~I' 5:»; YEARS.

A BALI. ARE R}AT"I{III\/IBAIIAGODU VILLAGE,

KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK,

V I I.I3'A_I§I'GAII_,G{zE URBAN DISTRICT.
" BANGALORE-74.

… PETITIONERS

(By STIGGNARASIMHARALJU, ADV.)

I _AI\ID:

STATE OF KARNATAKA.

REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL,

SECRETARY. REVENUE II)EPAR’I’MENT,
M S BUILDING, BANGALOREWOI.

I’ -J

Ix.)

THE TIIASILDAR.

BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK.

BANGALORE.

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER.

BIDADI POLICE STATION.

BIDADI. RAMANAGAR DISTRICT.

[By Sri S B SHAI-IAPUR, AGA.)

THESE W.Ps ARE FILED PRAYI:NG

ENTIRE PROCEEDING IN vC.C.NO’.’856,/07 .I§ENDI’NGI
BEFORE THE CHIEF JU’D:iC.IAL ” z»IAC4.IsTI€Afi9E”‘ SAT
BANGALORE AS PER ANNWK ..1_s A..¥{IS1.T\TG_,OUT OF
THE CHARGE TEH BIDADI
POLICE.

_– COMING ON FOR
PRELIMIIVARE’.HtfiARI’DIC}’–TE-IS DAY, THE COURT MADE
THE FO{I§L»QW.INIG:_I’I’AI. ”

” I ORDER

A counsel for the petitioners brings to the

Court the judgment Of this Court in the

ease ..O’I.SI.1Vi’t.LaIitha Sastry Vs. State Of Karnataka and

AOI:h..ersI”passed in W.P.NO. 3969/2007′ and connected

AA”I.1’1I.’2Itters disposed of On 22.9.08, which is produced at

mAnneXure–L to submit that similar matters are

allowed and the proceedings of the Court below are

quashed on the ground that the requirem_en_t._Cas

contemplated in the circular dated 8.9.08 _

RD 674 LGB 2008 is not foilowed. vthe.”

judgment is produced at Anvi;1eX:i’1e’e:éL«’=to’~

petition. The same was to’ oi
the Court at the time of thisivrritpppetition
on 11.3.2010. is
recalled. V V it

2. For _ *very_ fireaésons ‘ ‘assigned and the

conchgsion W.P.No.3969/O7 and
connected’ of by this Court on 2211″

September the proceedings insofar as

V concerned in C.C.856/O7, pending on

. ‘the~fi1eJudiciaI Magistrate. Bangalore are

‘C it

it Accordingiy, writ petitions are allowed.

‘Liberty is reserved to the State or its Officers to

C comply with the requirement as contempiated in the

Circular dated 8.9.08 bearing No.RD 874 LGB 2.008

.” .r-

before initiating any action against the petitioriérs;-V[;ivV’4

need arises. Ail the contentions raised “the. Wfit_ ‘s H

p€titOI1 are kept open to be ad}f.:dicated.<&as.'éir¥vd_ V§Ih–én

occasion arises.

ms

Dvrz