IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE'*_ DATED THIS THE 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2909' " BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. EIAGAMOEEAN VV.P_No.3790[20(§9_( KLR--RES) _ . _ BETWEEN: V' ' SR1 s CHANDRAKRP. _ . AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS ' S/O SHESHA HAND}, I _ : OLD A' MADIWAEA _ _ BANGALORE--560 C58; V _ ..PETITIONER " '(Ey Sni§isE:AN'EgxEA1§*AEEYANAEHAT, ADV.) 1. STATEOEKARNATAKA " ~ --« REE. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERIMENT ' REVENUE. DEPARTMENT, ._ M'.S. BUIL'DING, " DRJEMBEDKAR VEEDH1 E BANGALORE--560 001. Cviw 2 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA DISTRICT, SHIMOGA 3. THE TAHSILDAR THIRTHAHALLI TALUK THIRTHAHALL-I SHIMOGA DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK THIRTHAHALLI SHIMOGA DISTRICT. A _ %.j.';.vRES0E"ONDENTS (By Sri RKUMAR, HCGR FOR 0 _ 0' ThivslRefit'iiétitifiiijqlfiledfliindeiliAiiicies 226 & 227 of the Constitution 0f'I11dia'fiiayirigltqh"H. ' ' This peiitiori comifig £011 for preliminary hearing 'B' group this day; the,court'1::1_adé the following; QRDER ._ 'i:0.)V}C'Cf21si011 this court vide order dated 26.05.2008 in w.R;:~Jp.'4751/2008 directed as under: " 0 Respondent N053 and 4 are directed to consider the
Annexure-F filed by the petzhfoner and survey
0 0 bzfizrcare the {and proposed to be purchased by the
%Z§\w/xy
petjuioner to the extent of three acres in Survey No.26 of
Shirupathj village, Thjrthahallj Taluk, as eXpedit1ousI’:fVt»ast._V_
possible, but not later than the outer fjmjt of three;’;fneri’£h_s ;_ A’ ‘
from the date of _rece1pr of this order, 1fnecessa1j;zh_’]egaf.A_fees
arepajd by him.
2. In compliance of this ‘ortier the ‘~reV’e.nfi_:e ‘authorities
conducted survey, measured. atheflhand qtiestion and prepared a
sketch. Further when the petitioner reqtiestedto’ issue podi copy
of the land in’qiiestion_, thei1iiougned–endorsement was issued on
1.1.2O093_as per the impugned endorsement, it is
stated that t’h..ere_is irariancesii the extent of land claimed by the
_peti§1e»:nerLA’an:d as ‘sfich…pa§<ka podi cannot be done. It is further
e_stated'that_A}Eare_Band Durasti is not yet done. The entire record
relating to thej'..-measurement and the preparation of sketch is with
' 4" * .. V' the eDeput«y" Commissioner.
fitwx
\V _ disposed of.
4
3. Therefore, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to
a roach the second res ondent — De ut Commissioner with
PP P P Y
Whom the entire record is pending with a request to gVrar.1_tllthe
necessary copies. If such a request is made by the peti§tiionei*,j’ .
the respondents to furnish necessary copies in_”acco1’dfa»nce i_witl’1_ V
law. If the petitioner is aggrieved ,
respondents in relation to the measiirement and’pr_”e-paration of a
sketch in respect of land qi;esti_:on,_he entitled tolwork out his
remedy in accordance withAVlaxiv.r–.V
Withr. the above iobservation the writ petition is hereby
Sd/~
JUDGE
i ‘_
