High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri S Jagannathan vs M/S Bangalore Development … on 25 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri S Jagannathan vs M/S Bangalore Development … on 25 August, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


IN ‘[1115 men (‘JOUR’£’ 09 KARNATAKA AT :_ A’

med this mezs” day ufAugust, ‘

-‘mavens:-5»

1HEHON’BLEMRJUS3IC?E Hviwgiég-ml G .§.:d;IaEsii: V%

Writ Pawn 113?2}’% . 299: mm;

1 Srislmatmathan, 74y”r’s.’ *
S/o!a1eRSrinivasan ” ._ C i
R/a#27e7r2,_i1:;LntAstae».”‘ ” . ..
New ” K’ ‘ WfidNe~.-‘}’4

2 ‘
S:-“MPC11¢*-_ilapr¥a’ 1
R’z3a#46-A.”V£>i2-ffiittkfl ‘
# fi’3:’9i;, .. _
596733 ..

‘;jS1i$Nuay’.m;m:S!oSri:1i\asar,673aa

” snej3aw.agisaih:mug¢syu
‘ ” zap ;i’aaWa;di–Sam.¥Jam’vaRao
. R:*a1=:~ppe;j15e,2<re.411,1'Dm1

SmatT1_iiVa~gheac.503r13
.. " * Win Icahn Vatghese
H _.-R!aPrqact1yNo.4, 1"-D Mm!
7"Mah;, 3"' stage, New T
Bangakxe Peiiticmcm

And:

flak:-IeDcw!% Azfiority
‘1’ChowdaiahRoad,KPWe.st

(BySn”RaviGSabhahit,Adv.) L’

This Wfit Peliflm is filed {if the
pn’z3’ingtoconskietfl:ecascef~:1ae pasaitigaayetdasof
demolition or interfering vs=ith’*£h£.- and enjoyment of
Scheduke A-Dpropeflies. « — W

was Writ this (hy, the
Counmade the f¢§1pw?:ig:. . ‘– % ”

Peiizimm mam to consider the case of the

pe11II”oners bei2:;g”pm§&:g.”ag;y% % of demolition or intc:1’fenxg’ with the

_ Atoflpmpettics.

._ 1 __ petmoners,’ ‘ they have putchaaod the scheaned “site

_mwa&a 1~:_cs.743&£ , HALms:age,B.ngaaonm¢era

” ” ” deed. Thaereafia-, am is elm’ m” g that me land was ac®uaed’

1972 am it was kept vacmt. However, 61: pdiiiamts me said to

thee13twlnl’eowmtsmdacom’dmg’ toflne

7mspm.aentBnA,meaaidsa;ewasmadebymemiganmawnemam%aaae

If the BDA funds it ‘mapproptiatc for me

selling’ the property after re:.:etv1″ “nag the compensation, it libe;-1v_ “ufiaoé

criminalcaseagainstlhcownar.

Petition is allowed.