Sri.S.K.Ramesh vs Sri.Basavaraja on 25 February, 2010

0
53
Karnataka High Court
Sri.S.K.Ramesh vs Sri.Basavaraja on 25 February, 2010
Author: H.G.Ramesh
M. F.A.No.4312/2009 and
Misc.Cvf.10976g2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010'. 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE  ' E.

Miscellaneous First Apgeal

And V
Misc.cv:.1o976;<2009A-A % V
BETWEEN: E '

SR1 S.K.RAMESH
S/O KAGEGOWDA

AGE: ABOUT 29 YEARS
R/A'l'NO.I3.23*'{E” _
E3ANAsHANKAr9.:–~.3R§> si}fAt.:E __ ~
BANGALORE 5 ” ‘

(BY SR} R;IÂ¥1A1,§:j:3HA}max/¢;A.’1’I«;.)
AND:

1 SR} BASAVARAJA
5:0 RANGAPPA * ‘
..AiNCI+1~£:PA£,YA;–KUMBALAGQDIJ
“~KEN..C’-:E3R§A.HOB1.I” “”” ”
‘ n , BA%\_§(}ALQRE

2 . “-‘_§;N1*I*:«:DD,11Nsi3§2ANc£: co. LTD.
V BRANCH. ‘j().FF1c§:, No.40. 15″‘ FLOOR
“-LAK§aHM:.–~”c0MPIEx. mm’, KR. ROAD
. 13A..Nc:AA1.oI.1.0v_vm(;:’

JUnGMEN1_

There is a delay of more then t’e11.

days] in filing the appeal.

for condonation of the delay. ‘heard t.he_AA1e;:I’ned
counsei appearing for perused the
affidavit. filed In my

opinion. the :cai1se7fsI;:_0wr;i,_is~..not s1_;iffi«:1ient to condone

the inordinate’3:2?;’days_”ih’Vzfiling the appeal.
Accordingly’, it is dismissed.

Consequently, t§he_V’app=eaI’v_alsb stands dismissed.

JUDGE

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *