High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri S L Dhananjegowda vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 16 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Sri S L Dhananjegowda vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 16 September, 2008
Author: N.K.Patil
{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA'i'AK§; AT B GALO - W.P.No.19478l2007

5 SRI GAN€3AfiHARAlAH
MANAGSNG DIRECTOR.
KARMATAIQK STATE COIR CGOPERATIVE
FEDERATEON LIMWED,
4TH BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR,
BANGALOREJ360 010.

(By Sri : B, VEERAPPA. AGA FCIR R1 TO 4;
R5 -- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTEG} _ 3.. _V

M" " *

THIS WRIT PETITEON .ss~su.E9ruNma ARTICLES 226 mo 22': o:=
THE. CGNSTWUTION or :NcIA..:_=>aAv:;ue To U-:REC"i'TTHE RESPONOENTS
To IMPLEMENT THE moan DT._T5.11.2¥30f§' v1c;£;ANr~4Ex,:=. PASSED BY
THE FIRST RESPONDENT AND, EURTHER. 'Ql_':".,E£;:T THE THIRD

RESPONDENT To miT;ATe ::}E’w.RTMEr4″TAL ENQUIRY AGAINST sm.
GANGADHARAIAH.l%5a._AC:CO§!DANCE wfiH.jmw.;=’ maacr THE FIRST
RESPONDENT TO F<_3RTHVSm"H 'WlTHE}RAW THE' senvacas 0? SR1.
GANGADHARAZH-XH "AME .-9osT.._Am.<._ A£'*JOTHER. » SUITABLE omcm AS
MANAGING nwzeciroa IN' »:<ARN.«Tmm STATE com COOPERATIVE
FEDERATlQNLlHi:.!TE£I.«1.;AND To DIP.EC.T__ THE FOURTH RESPGNDENT To
ENQUlREvT'lNTCr-THE MATTTERAS–Pea. seamen 64 OF KARNATAKA co.
OPERATIVE soc:ET.£5s Aaztfr A.-mic SUBMFI" A REPORT TO THIS HGNBLE
coum' AS PER o:29e:raj'aT.a.12–.goeT was ANNEXJ.

THIS wR:T PET:TIf3r§c<§iT!.1N¢ ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'a' GROUP, THE. BAY, THE <.?QUEi"T MADE THE FOLLOWING:
_____ Q E D E R
'V this petition has saught for a direction,

diréafinQv'fiTé:'.w'r;nsponden$ to impiement the order dated

No§®2T=ber 2007 marked as Annexure F passed by

Téspondent and furflwer direct the fnird respondent ta

VT "initiate departmantal enquiry against Sri. Gangadharaiah

/,__,______,#__._….

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.i94 7312667

‘,.; X T i’

IN THE HXGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE W.P.No. 1947812007
V S

forwarded to His Exceilency Government of Karnataka,

to first re$pondent, after affording opportunity.—-._to
petiticner and fifth respondent, as expediti;;;;=_:_Qj.4 2
possible, but not later than four months

of receipt of a copy of flais order. A’ T A

7. With these obsewatigzns, petifié>E§..fiiéd
petitioner stands disposed of.

sal-

BMV* A judge

IN THE HIGH COURT BF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.’Ne. i9a1′?8:’2B{Y}’