IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE em DAY OF OCTOBER 2too§tt:% BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICJEAJIT WRIT PETITION NO. 1 8 1 25 BETWEEN : Sri.S.N.Jagadeesh, _ . . _4 V _ Son of Sri.S.Pl.navanathasa,".o j, V' Aged about 35 years, E _ ' Residing at No.25/1, . 1031 Cross, Ma11}i;oi1atIzt_anagar;'~ V. Bangalore %--;»55ot'oo2'3.t ,; T ...PETITIONER . .Asets., Advs.) ANDRE:-, _ Smt.J.M.F'arVatfi1. " it Al1asA.Pav1thfa,, wire, Aged-i,abo'ut 31 year__s_,é . No.50, 814'-*1 Cross, Magadi road, "- it _(NeXt' an heatre), Bang.a1ore.'g;._55o 023. ...RESPONDEN'I' " writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and of the Constitution of India with a prayer to Cali for V the records in M.C.No.1068 of 2006 pending on the file _o_f7the 2nd Add}. Prineipai Family Judge, Bangalore and etc. This writ petition coming on for preliminary hearing, this day, the Court made the following: M ORDER
The petitioner is the husband. He.~filedj*’ia”petitio_n ” it
under Section 13[1}[ia) of the fC.”i_”
dissolution of the marriagef i1’_espon~dent an 2 . i’
application under Section lgiargiiage Act
for maintenance. The learned
Farniiy Judge ‘.having””:’»’income of the
petitioner at the rate
of wife and a sum of
Rs.1,5t)__C)/e ‘ the child from the date of
appiicationduring’th”e:’:_”pendency of the proceedings.
Hence, this petitio.n__._’___V
hi’ évipertised the impugned order. Apparently,
the ‘~l.earnedviA.}7Aamily Judge has exercised his discretion
has-1 awarded the maintenance at the rate of
A _.é’RVs:;2,dOO/- per month to the wife and Rs.1,500/~ to the
child. Having regard to the cost of living, I am of the
/’
-3-
View that the said award of maintenance cannot be
termed as excessive.
In so far as the second prayer regarding rfierno
filed by the petitioner for withdrawal of the
concerned, that is required to be consi;iei”ed’
Family Court oniy after the
order passed on the application efo-1′. intégrim
maintenance.
With this obsertr_at.icon.’,_’Ah stands riisposed
