High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri S Papaiah Reddy vs The Managing Director Bescom on 3 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sri S Papaiah Reddy vs The Managing Director Bescom on 3 September, 2009
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda
2:; 'THE HIGH coum" or-' KARNATAKA AT BANGA_LjC)R'E..'_';-'«..:   

DATED "ms THE 33*' DAY or-' SEPTEMBER,~w.?£§.C}jQ   %

BEEF<3F{E

THE HON'BLE MR. Jusmzs A.a:'.xz'ENL}GQ'PALA sVc:2,§.r£j,§;  %

wan' PET'I'¥"ION ~o.142z?'g%2.<§o9(kAGM»%Ks~;$)% 

BETVVEEN:

SR: 3. PAPAIAH REDEW, sffi 3R1f«-.9."--SI"f.)E};APPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 W;.fi;\R.'i=..,:'}__   a  
R/A No.13/2, vTlXb?zAR;r3;I K}3.NNAA:V'ROAD;""'
MURPHYTOWZEI, L::..s:p~:.:$re.,  . .
BANGALORE -+=s5'o_oo8.'   :PE'¥"ITIONER
(av SR: 9.3. RAJU, ADV.)  ,1  Y

AND:  " .  .  '
1. f."2'"H_E MAi~'i1!?s(5I_¥'€'.3V DIREGETQR',
sAa4eA;.QR.& Eaamaxcm supmr
CO!VfP..Ab1Y 'Li.PViI.'_TE'§)',»_  ._

 i(.R. czgc:_ E,«T'3A~MA§AL{mE »» 1.

V2; "ms CHIEF Emzbaeaa,
BANGALGRE E{;ECTRICITY supmv
% "€SG,M.PAN_Y LIMETED,
 .K.R'. QERCLE, BANGALORE - 1.



3. THE EXECUTEVE ENGINEER,
BARGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY
COMPANY LIMITED,

EAST DIVISION, MUSEUM ROAD,

BANGALGRE --~ 25. I:l:RE:-'§§*Q'F3RBE_N*fS-  

(EY SR1 N.K. GUPTA, ADV.)

mxs WRIT PETITION IS J::Fi~L.ED."¥J'RfiER AxRTICLEf3H226V AND 227

(JP THE CONSTITUTION OF '"INi}1A_  " TO DIRECT THE
RESPGNDENT AUTHORITY TC} TAKEV_P§353S:ESSI(3?i'V.€)§f. Tf§E METER RR
N€}.3315 SITUATEB IN THE PRENISEES BEARING N'Q;13/2, T.K. RGAD,

MURPHY TOWN, ULSOGR;.,_}3ANGA1§.QRE --.3;   V:

THIS PETI'f€i(V}t~i:j_ r¥r{EL1M1wARY HEARING THIS
BAY, THE CGURT. Maps *:f::;:E_ r"9L3.._QWINGV;"~v



  Tbé:,;§ra*yer ii"V:.'t%'1V3:'.=VLV'V1V!fi:'II petition is to direct the respondents

t£>.__tai§e~» po$§as5i.§n. __ef.Mete:’ No.RR 3315 instaiied at premises

17*R/___V’beafik1§’~i*ic;’1§jvz.,’%’a§narai Karman Road, Murphy Town, Uisoar,

4Ba;nga§c:;?e..

The rewendants have not filed any siatement of

6

3. Sri ?~i.i(. Gupta, learned ceunsei for the respq.afi’e:fit$,

invited my attentien to the cenditien at pare 4.G9_.{:i\?) ‘

Conditions of Supply ef Eiectricity of aistripetion ieicevééeeeie-iheié ‘w

State of Kamaiaka issued by the KERC. Zfheil-geiiij ‘4p:;£w.iS’i§’n”‘{‘eede_AA

as under:

4.09 GENERAL

(i) to (iii) xxxx

(iv) If any ;’.i£3E”‘.iiJt3. ifio for a
premises e§–vi§(erV__e§_J;ii’;§iyV.Agreereent has

been -the service line is
dismantleci:_’uesfl;ietibe treated as a fresh
A;3pI.i_i;’eVnt. aiwd ~- ::Liere’oié before connection is given.
4; Cen.siti«:ering the nature of prayer, there carmet be

*–i«3.e;iy__’d.£fficu§ti;_fér the respondents in taking back the said meter

V ‘ “–.frc.,,{$*i:__¥1’e»s:aij.id premises. 1

5. However, in View of the specific provision asVV_ai;ioi1e,

it is open to the respondents to coiiect the outstandinegeznaeirs;–._if’

any, in respect of the said premises, wherein the ‘afo–re_saio rrgeier’~

has been instaiied, in case, the petitioner /;japj;i3iica_nt’ to-p;oi’o-a__g:iie_S

the respondents for fresh eiectricitfir ‘connection ”

The writ petition stemis aii’owefi_’.VVV”The responoents are
directed to remove the itiei’e€tric.it§i_}Lvfrieter from the

eetitionefls premises’ .:\%.~ieei{sivi’frorh izooay.

Liberty is ‘to”th”e…respondents to give effect to the
afore–noticeci condition petitioner approaches for a

fresh eiectiicityiwcowection .i.e., to coiiect the outstanding

arreiiarsgiiii any, ioefore new connection is given.

, .«0~r§éi”er}’*_evcco’rii’irigiy.

Sd/-

JUDGE