IN THE HIGH COURT OF TKARNATAKA AT BANGALORE' Dated: This the 931 day of March QOOFAI' " BEFORE 'I'HE'_¥~iON'BLE MRJUSTICE M.F.A.NO. 603?/;_2o°o6_ BETWEEN: SR] 8 PRABHAKAR... S] Q,.5A1$z;:E'E:i!AIA1é' AGED ABOUT31--.YE--'AR--S ~ V NO 49, 3&1) CROSS," ' ' ASHOKPURA, YEswANA*:'H:§uI'éA.' ' ;V ._ BANGAIgQ.1§'E..,_ ' -~ 'I-7.'.';vAE-'9I3ELLANT (By Sri KT GL¥j§§':Ji5E*JA"'1'3: INDIA INSURANCE co LTD A J} R RAJAGOPALAN, ABV, ma R2) V I II FLGQR, INDIAN MUTUAL BUILDiN(} N-.,R. "SQUARE, BANGALORE ~BYj_ITS DIVISIGNAL MANAGER RESPONDENTS
MFA FILED UIS 173(1) C313′ MV ACT AGAIQNST THE
‘”gIUDGMENT AND AWARD DA’I’ED:i9.i1.2U()5 PASSED
IN MVC NO.3837/2005 ON THE FILE GP’ THE IV
ADDL.JU{)Ca’rE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER,
MACI’, MEETROPOLITIAN AREA, BANGALORE
{SCC3H.NO.6), PARTLY ALLOWING THE €LAIM PETITIQN
FOR COMPSJNSATION AND SEEKiNG E;~xi~1A:~aoE_Nn%ij1~s%:”‘–,_
OF’ COMPENSATiON.
‘THIS APPEAL COMING OP{~iF’O–R. :~«rr;:A1§éi1?ii’¥i’+ ‘§’fi.tS «
my, THE coum DELIVERED THE FC;)’_LL~OWENG i’
JUQGMEEEA
Compensation Vat§ija1’d§:ii”‘ ‘ ‘f:1a2t’ii’1i1{a¢1i1t~-iszy the
tribunal is called in mainly
on the award any
amount gaming Caflacify
despite “”” Viiiolicating 50% limb
oxicl sought under the head
of loss of earning durirzg the
” V’ . “”” ” ‘V
counsel Sri. K.’i’.Cxu3:’I_1éev Prasad
for-4._the§v’ refezming to the medical evidence
opxbnoittod that the appeliant sustained a fracture of
& femur and fracture of right ankle joint and
-*’-iias undezwent two operations and medical evidence
has put the disability at 50% for the limb, and 55%
}/
…/
3
for the whole body and therefore the appellant is
entitled to loss of future earning capacity as he ie a
Coolie engaged in loading and unioading. Under.
head of pain and sufi’erir1g, the amount
lower side so also under the head. of 30;-:e”t)i’
during the treattmemz period.
4. Leagmed __
81′}. R. Rajagopalan; for “-eoiepany
argued that the ;_ioetor is on
the higher V’ 1′:he fracture
sustained 1:1-*;ez’efore the court
may g;o:ésieé;¢. having regard to
these 4′ V ‘.
5. “§-3’1 View. of._tI1’e” above submission made and
V’ .,ha’£?4i;1g2,._*-gene the evidence on record and
by the appelianj: not being
(Z}4i£§§$¥.1te(fy. of the View that the whole body
can be taken as 55% regard to the
V.”V’.oee1:ipation of the appellant and therefore taking the
.,,_%e<::ome at Rs.3,()Of%/~» per month and applying the
no
mtxltipiiar 16 towards 103:; (}f future earning
amount to which the appellant will be _
Rs.86,400,l-. To this, Rs.10,00o/;% will §1av~e ijjf:;r: '*.:§e'–AV _
added towards pain and
towards loss of eanmg du1~i§1g.:;V1e {:~es¢men: J
Therefore, the Z by
Rs. i,{)4,50{)/-_ The at
60/6 p.&
by allowing the
Tudge