Sri Santhosh H.P. vs The State Of Karnataka on 9 July, 2009

-1-

IN 'THE HIGH COURT' OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED T'HiS THE 9"' DAY OF JULY 2809
BEFORE
THE HOIWBLE MR. JUSFECE B.S.PAT}"i:

WP. NO. 19009; 2009 u,A-'K33;  " " 5. 

BETWEEN

(By $zi"'VE!\§RA'15EL$i~i P.Vi3Ai;1'J3.*'AI, ADV.

SR1 SANTHOSH 14.13. _ 
S]O.LA'I'E} PURUSHO'1'TAM_ 

AGE 40 YEARS, 
OCC:AGR!€ULTUR~Ii} .
R[O.RUKfvIINlNIVASAA   V  
SILVER JUBILLE PARK R-mag)   
K R PURAM, HASSAP-.¥+f= ' ' "

 PETITIONS}?

FOR s3RIyARuLAw.'AmR'M'}'« "

AND,' 1.

C.'i'i'%?l}":3 S':';A*1'E; €>i:'r{ARNATAKA

I%§:v;;sgI;;§;_ 93?? (A0081)

  *'JIDHA.NA SOUDHA
--+ -.;3Ara%:*;AL:3RE--1
 BY :TS..>s;3:CRBrrARY

 SPL. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARS

._ H CAUVERY 3:-mvmsz,
" 1;',jI'-1?'  
12x3 iN so FAR as 30 FEET EASE'-wgsrg-.,8e:::  
NOR'l'i-I-S()U'I'I~§ AS INDICATED 1N::'ééii1§:)U.LE:'G§% A;s:j\1'Ex-"'.

A, PRODUCED AT ANNEX-G.

TH§$ PE'FYi'I(}N coM1Né'=Q N p0:é'-P _1"21;,9ir. 'QEARING
Tflifs DAY, THE COUE?§""fs1ADE"'}'H'E.: 'gt'c§'L1,0w1N(3: 

2.   12é?:ii:'«;§»ii=,titi0I1 petitioner is chaflengng

 V"i:=.:s:,.;e;d 11,! :5. 6(1) 3f the Land. Acsquisitien

 'd,a;i:a::;€:1%  puhiislled in the Dfiiciai gazette on

 _'  the impugrled ntntjfimtion, the property

 cf the  ;:A)e§:it:i011er along with the pmperty be1£i1t:1;  fr§)m  the miief.
1 do not find any   .Atixi.§V.gij0:}teI1ti<A§fiA. Father
cf the peU'tioI1er._Was  fhe year £2008.
He had    _'fief<:}V1e'e  "tf1(:""'Land Acquisition
f;3i'f':cef;,_a:1.cl _ijf;fQi-Ifiied about the date (if hearing.

What ac:':i<3:1*h: iio§:i}g~:VA'thie:i*:§4a'Vii'ter is not forthcoming. If the

, 'fai:h£~§r of the fietitionzir was aggrieved by the acquisitian

 "aha shcauld have Challenged the $211116

  6(1) n.ot:i:['1cat;i0n was issued. It is well

 es:a:'t:_§iShe'€ic that in matters where land is acquirézd for

' ..ff;:§t;:i3§,ic purposa, the courts will be very slow in

iiutarfarirzg with the matter where, the gievanoe is made

'after 3 icmg iapse af' tixne. Tharefore, gievance mafia

%



by thfi patitiener regarding the chailenge ta?'--.pth<:

acquisition pmceedixlgs caxmot be eI1te1'tai11c:d.  §ii1L':'§'y41'_1'~C1} V.

beiatsci stage'

5. However, counsei  _ 1'<319 

petitioner makeits an  A§303.5Il"3Z.vVt:Yl;';1f':..Sii';{3{i: the 

petitioner does; I101: hays an§r=---fiiiiaei'-~..site 2.213% this is the
only site measuring  80  is (mined by tbs

family, he    appmach the

respemdcint_é:51t1ii;23t'itjes. seé};.i11g..a;i1otment of site sf equal
di1nen $i0f}__ fir _ bf  Ieasonabk: diznensien to
enable him-« to-hVav;e  aiiode for himself.

"    Keépi17:g._i_r: mind the facts and circumstanccs

 'r3f':?~11bz11ission made by thfi learrzed counsei

f{;1.f tl.*'1&  deserves to be acceptad. Hence, I pass

-- '  ti1e'fQ¥_i§ax?i£t1g order.

 '°?. The chafisnge made to tha acquisitiefi

 '"fir0<:ee:diI1gs is rejected. The psefitioner is giw-31:: liberty

'%/..



to approach the respondent autholéties 

allotrném; of any site in the lay out in accordantifi

law.

Ju&gé%.Q;j

dvr: