Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 29 October, 2009

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 29'?" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009__.__

PRESENT

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE V.GoPALA    ~

AND

THE HONBLE MRS.JUs'I'1c:E"~B.v;_N;A}GARA:1'f1NA 

W.A.N0.325;'2£)_.{)9[SC3#$'i'} A  *

BETWEEN:

SR1 SATYAN . 

s/0 LATEK_APPU.....__'-. ._ 
AGEB      
R/AT Nc}.453; 3R9?BLQ'CK,_'   "

     

  * ~ . 

. . .APPELLANT

(By Sri: KVS':r1A:=;:£;1i  ADV.)

~ __  COMMISSIONER
BANGALORE RURAL BISTRICT

  'V.V.'I'OW:ERS

'  PODIUM BLOCK,

" DR,B'.'R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
EAT$e*GALORE

9 A ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

.'.~t

" RAMANAGAR SUB DIVISION
 AGAR

SR1 LAYU '

S/O SR1 BASHA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT HAKKIPUKK1 COLONY



N»

BANNIKUPPE PAN CHAYATH
BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

 RESI'§')1'\§37;i'$.ISI;E71?_fV A' 

{By Smt: VIJAYA A D. AGA}

WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4;"   
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE '~'1'I~iE QRB~E'..RT_

PASSED IN THE WRIT PETETION '---10808/2007 " DATEI3
15.12.2008

i

This WA c0ming;;:”*~Qn this day,
NAGARATHNA J, made the fokkowiifiig: – *

gjiosted with regard to
non–c0mpli–sno¢ since we have dismissed
W.ANo.322k2Q(59., applies to this
Scase alscg, ‘ this isV’a<si'3.ordmgly rejected.

~ ….. .. \_

Sd/-

IUDGE

Sci/~
§UDGE