Sri Shekar Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 August, 2009

0
47
Karnataka High Court
Sri Shekar Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 August, 2009
Author: A.S.Bopanna
   , V THE ASST. COMMISSIONER

V " _  " '.3 THE TAHSILDAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  L' 
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUsT,i2piQ<;.'.,jjj V' A T4 
Bavoaa          
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE1'AA§$.§3'OPz§I§:If{A = "  

WRIT PETITIQN NO. 1249«?V34’i:”.2:%’r99/.fi(}O9″ikhfélifij
BETWEEN : ”


SHEKAR SHETTY   «
s/0 LATE RAMANNA   '

AGED ABOUT 65.YEA~RS  I    z

000; AGR1cULTpR-gT.T- _ _ _ ”

R/AT’INI}RA;’¥iAV.AKI§!i3?a;?”– ”
INE)RALI;v_SHIVAL§;} WLLAQE-.,._ .

MANCHI K1oD;P0STj’V-~A.T_ _
UDUPI ‘i’ALU__I<'s;. DIVS'I'R1'('i"_I""-A.,_ ""' PETFEONER

{BY Sm: ?1§Asé;i~J.r};A R,"'Ar${z.)

" VAT_THEg"sTA'I*s:_ 'cm KARNATAKA
~. "REP; B'Y,I'i*$' SECRETARY
' .9391. DE' 'REVENUE
tvs.s;–. ABUELEING
BANGALORE — 01

_ '"i{UNDAPUR SUB-DIVISION
E UDUPI DISTRICT , UDUPI

UDU PI TALU K, UDU PI

L

R

with regaxd to the validity or otherwise of the

erders at Armexures A and B, it is not in dis_§f1'te«i .

against the said orders, there isman eitern:ate'''fand '4

eifieacions remedy by way of appeei under

the Karnataka L-and Revenue' a1so"eVier1'ed Vi

the petition that the remedyV__eif-..ta'ppeal"eoiiid not be
availed at the point L petition was

presented, since the appeiiett: busy with

the Election' — .9

2._ et present the petitioner can

“avail..”:iiiii1e;,,e.ifefl1edyiA V’of~appea1′ , the petition is disposed of

to the petitioner to approach the

aptieiiete With regard to the limitation, if

«deny, the spent by the petitioner in prosecuting this

shall be excluded by the appellate authority.

i

A

In terms of the above, both the ‘Writ Petitions”
stand disposed of. No order as to costs. _ 3 ‘ V

Akcj bms

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *