Sri Shekarappa S/O Late … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 26 August, 2010

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, 

DATED Tms TI-IE 26m DEV OF  2016 E ~ 

THE HON'BLE MR.JIT"S"1fICE'TR4*'§Fu{EV MQi:;m,_REDD*E '
WRIT PETITION ";_i-.1444 oTE~2do9% IEDA)
B BEN V  . 1. '.

SR1 SHEKARAPPA  - v_ 
S/0 LATE _H«.'{}_URUSiDDAPPA    
_ _    
R/AT BHAVIHALWVILL/jaGE,.._  V. "  V
ANAGODU MQBLI, NARAGANAHALL1 POST,
DAVAN;A.(3ERE"-TQ &=.D1--sT 

REE BY ITS'GPg\"HOL_DER. j

C.R."DHANY.A   " 

s/0 B..G'CHAI\IN;APPA"~._ ' '

AGE: 294-YEARS~.__  -~  PETITIONER

 $1.: uSHA}VIS,.AH1vIED PATI-IAN, ADV)

 =   COMMISSIONER

pd

 BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
' .. 'BANGALORE

 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
NORTH DIVISION, BDA COMPLEX
R.T.NAGAR, BANGALORE.  RESPONDENTS

‘O [By Sri. : BASAVARAJ V SABARAD, ADV )

THIS WP FILED PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENT TO NOT TO DEMOLISH THE COMPOUND

M

WALL OF THE PETITION SCHEDULE PROPERTY WITHOUT
THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND CONSEQUENILY TO
QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DT.22.12.08, 017; fI2:2;~ i.e..
ANN–G;AND ETC. T ”

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR

GROUP THIS DAY, TI-IE COURT”MAD.F}_’I”I-IE; FQL’L_QwING’:. ij A’

onnfigs
There is no represefiffition for._f_he it}.-)efivf;i’Vcq)VVrV1er when

the case is called. ‘}ience’;Nfhe~:’pef’t ition dismissed.