Sri Shiva Madegowda vs Deputy Commissioner on 29 October, 2009

NEW

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 29'" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009_..__

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE VGOPALA    ~ '

AND  

THE HONBLE MRSJUSTICE;'B.V;_i\iI¢'§G}§RI4XT§§IN2X 

W.A.NO.332;'O20Q9£SC;«fST}.  "
BETWEEN:  A' '

SR1 SHIVA MADEGOWDA _

S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA  
AGEDAB0U'I'41AYEARS_._.__     
R/AT No.26, 9TI$MAIN;,_' SRDSLOCK. '  '
JAYANAGAR   7  i  * AV 

BANGAJIOIQE-..U_v A472' 1'
' 1' V I ...APPELLANT

{By Sri: K SIIASHI  ADV.)

    OOOOO 

 ' I "  D1"£PL1TfCOMMISS1ONER '

  RURAL DISTRICT
.  v.V.'IDWiERS
 PQDELIM BLOCK,
1;)R.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD
B;ANGALORE

 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
RAMANAGAR SUB DIVISION
RAMANAGAR

3 CHINNARAJ U
8/ O SR1 NATAM
MAJOR
R/AT HAKKIPUKKI COLONY

754



_ 2 _
BANNIKUPPE PANCHAYATH
BIDADE HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
 RESPONDENTS

(By Smt: VIJAYA AD. AGA}

WRIT APPEAL FILED U/S 4,91? 2

HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING T0 SET”As1_D.E
PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITIQN ,99.45/2.0o7-
15/12/2008. V ~_’a V.*- 2 E’. =

This WA coming on sday,

NAGARATHNA J, made the fo11owi”1:g:–

Though this matter regard to

non–compliance of office have dismissed
W.A.No.322/2009, Which”-(ieci_Si0f1 s’q{iaf:éiy”Rpphes to this
case also, this writ is I rejected.

1 I

sd/~
JUDGE

Sfi/~
EUDGE