Sri Shiva Madegowda vs Deputy Commissioner on 29 October, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 

PRESENT

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE v.gOPALA~'GOi2'yrOA::  I'  

AND
THE HONBLE MRS.JUS'I"I-C_E B§Vr..,N;~x_GAI'g;zI7Ii;m;§:x  I

w.A.NO.337/260SI(SO/Sij'---  '  

BETWEEN:

{By S

 

SR1 SHNA_EVL4gDEC3OWDA .'  -
S/O LA'I'ES':ODEGOwDA    .... ..
AGED_.,sxBOU?:i .{.11"Y_EA]E~1S   .
R/AT NO SW  3322 BLOCK.
_ 'V  
BANGALORE-I: 

...APPELLANT _

r_i_: K SOI=LASz1.u:1RAN'SIiET1Y, ADV.)

DFTPUvTY.OV.COMMISSIONER

""IBANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

__ V.VERS

I>..O'D_1UM BLOCK,
DP..,--B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD

'' ' «BANGALORE

I "THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

RAMANAGAR SUB DIVISION
RAIVIANAGAR

SR1 VENGAL

SR1 SRI E DAPODY

MAJOR

R/AT HAKKIPUKKI COLONY

£4



BANNIKUPPE PANCHAYATH
BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT

 R1«:SPo1\II>,E.__;_\I'I'S

(By Smt: VIJAYA K. AGA)

WRIT APPEAL FILED 11/8 4 OF THE 
HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE_.T_HE --Q'i2I_3ER~ __ 
PASSED IN THE WRIT pETmoN,N0...9943/200?» DA.'_1:'E]3_

15/12/2008

This WA Coming on for ORDERS

NAGARATHNA J, made the f011cv§iing:– ” I

gun G

Though this mati-Sr regard to

non–cof:Ip1i3.nSé v:.f Since we have dianissed
W.A.No.3’22/ 20O’9′;V. squarely applies to this

case ,thiS ‘aijpeél is accordingly rejected.

Sd/-

JUDGE

sax»
Iamg