IN 'I"}:~IE HIGH {ZOURT OF KARNA'I'Alnue Department
_ Lsmd Acqufisition 1 8: 3, M 5 Building
Bangalore
smtrazzvmeeta WioB Ashok, 453."
V 6 Sm! Annapooma 'Win Boxegowda
W
'! Sm: a WfoBoregowda
5-7 are rfa Udayapura Village
Dandiganahalli Hobli '
Chaumarayapanw Tq, I-Iassan
8 Tahsi1dar,Channm*ayapamaTq V .y «.
I-IassanDi5tric1 _
(By Sri M Keshava Raddy, AGA forVE3L1§4 & ._
Sri L Psuresh, Adv. fer R5 & 6; Sri P .
Adv. for R7) "
Tlfm Writ Petition is""'fi.i§d. :,A§ét;:>;:z$%227 of the Constitution
praying to quash the notification wdztedf20;2.2.()O8v A by the 4"'
It'2SP9Il(3£'aIl1, etc. . = A V "
This g€.::;'{fo;._nr-ien,'; : .. the Court made the
foilowing: '
93.953
Petitiongr has seam' the notification datad 20.2.2033 W
V annexygsin so} fat N033 to S of land in sy.1-:e.15 of Baladhare
« H' A' '-}f Taluk as arbitrary and also for such other orders.
'V agiggaisifion of property for the purpose of mtahlishing ITI
Co.vi'1e.g éA College, iand to an extent of 9.30 acres is sought
be acqazifegi by the Govmmaent. In this regard, the main contention efthe
% is, a original suit was filed and injunction was obtained by the
" against rcswndeaxts 5 to 7 mud when the acqtfisition is sought for,
335"
the respondents have some fotwmi seeking for
identity ofthe property is aiso disputed.
Heard the connect repraenting the»~pa1_-ties ~
Pleader.
The main gievance of the petifiaagx is, he 53. ”
of injunction before the Civil Court, w 3116 tlzeirespmxdents,
they have taken a different \?i::~saz{‘ as to identity of pmpexty is
coneemed. When the respondents are
claiming themseives, in the beginning,
have mm a* Ciizil Suit. Now, after the acquisition
proceedings, uirzzaflie .event_ of eompensation, the amount so awmded
_ would.§pevt6*ti1e the petitioner.
A _ ‘ Pei counsel for the rmpendcnts submitted that the civil suit is
property belongs to them and they are entitled for
eon§pensa§iura._ A
.. mvflzemseonhmifizedjspum isis1tespeetof§dentityof&zepmpe:ty
_ wh’icE:.§s sought to be acquired. According to the petitioner, property belongs
VA whereas acconling to respondents 5 1:07, it belongs to them md they
axe in possession. In this regard, a civil wait is pending and it fihe
petitioner to seek for early disposal of the mattar by %
on the basis of the smvey neport by appainting a b
the civil suit is disposed of before the civil
be disbunsed to either ofthe parties. Itjis for courjtpitt; L
matter pending before it and thereafter, taztgéidccisioia :75 tiisiiurgéitiiiiéiiaiizount V V
as per their entitlement, in witii iaifié; Vi “”
Petition is dispos_e{E–