High Court Karnataka High Court

Sri Shivalingappa S/O Irappa … vs Sri Mohammadali H Bhadurabai on 7 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Sri Shivalingappa S/O Irappa … vs Sri Mohammadali H Bhadurabai on 7 January, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan
MFA No.6857 of 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED TI-IES THE 7TH DAY OF' JANUARY 2010
BEFORE  ".""

THE I-ION'BLE MR.JUSTICE v.JAGAN1AATr1A1§   
MISCELLANEOUS 'FIRST APPEASNQ;6S£3'7/?'C£§7jMV}f»  'V
BETWEEN: J »T(T % TAT

Sri Shivalingappa, S /0 Irappa,B'enni, '

Aged about 34 years, Occ: Driver, 

R/0 Inarn Govanakoppa {Shiféangi),V"A-.._

Tq. Saundatti,   _   g   

Dist: Belgaum.  V     _1....APPELLAN'I'

A N D';

1. Sri  I=Ii.]3_1'faJ'<:1urabai,
Aged Major'; Qcfc: I3u'siness,
R}/0 1V[una{r'a11i, Tq, Saundatti,

 V'  _, '-Di"sta;'~Be~1gaum'. V " """ "

  2, :1'=l§tt-i4?5r1:aij..Insurance Co. Ltd..,

A A'D1v1si~o;_na1E~Qffice,
 at.-ha"  omplex, P. B . Road,
HL1b'ii,V Dist: Dharwad. ...RESPONDE1NTS

  [ByvSriV.NG.S.Balagangadhar, Adv., for R1 -- absent)

'    served)



MFA §'Jo.6857 of 2007

This miscellaneous first appeal is filed under
Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act again's_t"»ethe
judgment and award dated 28.03.2007 passed-«jin.fMV.C
No.61/2003 on the file of the Civil Judge;"'(*Sr5...Dri;._)',w~.
Additional MACT, Saundatti, partly allowing" the""e'lai.Irx 0' '
petition for compensation and seeking e.nhan.ce'rnent of -, 
compensation.   7  it " 

This miscellaneous first appeal coining «.on"~fore~._V
hearing this day, the Courtsde.livered_ the foe1'lo=;yinVg:  0 V
JUDGivI§fl  '   
Heard the learned counsel for theappellajrit. None

appears for the responideinit  respondent

has remained u.nrepre.s’ented service.

This :by the claimant seeking

er1hancerneI_lt.uof’ cornpensation on the ground that the

b°yt.h.e«’Tribunal is on the lower side and,

0seicondlygrioppiamount has been awarded towards ‘loss of

incorne the treatment period’.

3_.l”:.’l’aking into account the above grounds put

and the facts not being in dispute and so also

MFA N0.5857 of 2007

the liability put on the insurance company, only the
income aspect requires to be considered.
appellant is said to be a driver, taking note A V’
the accident, income could yhave, A at
Rs.4,000/– per month.

sustained, the disability at irizicihtlyill
been taken by the under the
head of ‘loss of future appellant would
be entitled to and,
thus, the –. Towards loss of
i4Rs. 1 ,OOO / — is awarded.

Thus, tliei enhanced by Rs.l3,000/–,
which will i inteire “at 6%.

AV,yarid.,&_.standisii«modified accordingly, by allowing

A ‘– ap in’ part.