Sri Shivaraju vs Sri H N Chendrashekar on 16 March, 2009

0
46
Karnataka High Court
Sri Shivaraju vs Sri H N Chendrashekar on 16 March, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil
32% THE 1115.121 C,{}E}RT OF §«iAR?'~3ATA§-{.3 AT BA}<§GALi}R}Z '§&'.?:}€{2.2«%S C3? 2939

*4

CO

"3
L

MUNECEPAL C{}1.3¥'~éCi1.L{}R
'e*v'§XRD N0 2; HUNSUR T€}W%4 £\+€UNfCiPAL§T":'
KALKi.%?~i£§<.E; HUN$i}R TGWN

8% M RAVESHAMKAR

Sifi LAJFE MONA?-JLAL PRASAO

A£ED ABOUT 5G"€'EAR3   »-
%e'¥%.3N§%C1%PA§. CCSUNQLLOR I
WERE N3 26,

HE}?-é<8UR TQWN %e4Li?'~4iC2PALET'*{

«"v'30{"3H§ S'fR€ET, RUNSUD TQWH .'

3&2? sagzassaaz
we pA:~:m:aA:4eA

AGED ABGLET as '{£'.~".AR:3.-- . , V-

ML¥?§%$i?AL C{}UNC%i.L<JR'*~._ 5

wape no 145,  ~ - «

mama MASJSE3 swag? .
HL;*-NSUR3TGV'v'N  ' }
sa¢rsaweg::*As4a:»:~;:vA::_    
' :3 aasuayas 5;  . A _   '
AGED AB{}é..4"€"_28 'wags _   M.
:sge:.;:4;<;s:=::.z, c:--:_:;a.2;_~:<::::.:_s3R  ._ ' _
wAR;::_uo    
HL;N»SUR mwu eset;;r~:a:1:;sv;2s,:'z'*{ .
3A¥{A.3fi€éTHEa"-"L}P..Afi.%.   -- .

HU%~iSUR 70¢-gm' 4'  ._ 

em zggewamaa :§¢'eH§'D§;:L$"_;::é%AazE:=
$10 R£HA&2.4AN :3HAR£EF_ 
5"--ts'Z';sE£2A3{)Lfz'-»35 vgms

.»;e:;.::~:::.".*s:~vAL C0{§a't3$LLQ§%
- «WAR$:NG-- 23,

V 'A A . _ auwsua :m:.5.r:~4 i'v1U¥*~§§C£F'ALé'£'Y

'$3

 '3aA:3£ERvmgG;«R
._T-3-::;:»*s;L;:.':<}c31,{*.RAf5HEKAR
SIG t~EA?%JEGQ'&'JDA _
mes ABOUT 39 YEARS,   V'
'sewn: MUNRXPAL Cfliflécil. .
HUNSUR **«.'
mvsaaa SESTRET

2 HAEARATH Jaw}:   V    
Q0 LATE M£:Aa::;E£R  =.   = 
was AEQUT. 35E"§'$:fiR£>§g"'     .

MEMBER"  "    7'
rows; ML::s;:c:P!%eL c<3.w:;=£.'vv j ..
Hurgsua    
ramcaa 5ss':'TRacT~':V

mguaag Ms:-.§s~_<A    _

3:0 M}'éKA%.A MAMA  *  "
AGES A7€<',_}L!'T 40 YEARS," . 
9ss%EM8ER  '    
":"s;a.:v:a:_ MUMCEPAL couzxecza.
.:<:a';:x:suR  ..... 
'-aevsaaae E3#STR$CT

(.0

q:3:o 5'1.J"F3fAt£§~§¥- . . 
- A629 ABCAJT as yams,

' saémsefi  '
mwrs: %v§U¥*££C3PA£. couuca.
aamsus
serrmaa ::::s'rmcT

, 1»: #5 i<R3SHNACHAR¥
 '.~:;:a LATE PUTTA3W&M3CHAR2

'E was ABOUT 36 YEARS,

g MEMBER
mm»: f.4i..¥NiC§PA£. ceuaxzcsz.
Huwsaa

Wimééfifits HIGH CiJiiié,'i'{,3b' s<:§[x:~:A*::»zz;A AT BANGALCJRE w.v.:a:aK2a5 air yzzmg"



EEK? Tim Ififiii CGIERT OF }{:§R?€ATAKA 4%"? §?;A}%GA,§..C}RE 'Jr'.?.1'«30,24§ C333 23%?
5

ORDER

Timugh this matter Es posited fer preiirninary he3:’fi:’r*sg.,

the sarne £3 taken up for fine} dispmsai with me A’ %

the {earned cmunsei appearing for both sides««§f;:d.v >

regarci ta the nature sf reiief saughffur §§§’Atn£€*:eu’;:;e5:”ti%’t¥:=i’é;’»

2. Petitianers in thisV’TV_pe.s§it§t3§9:’-..§ia.~x;e = fa?

quashing the order dated__ 1 Sm .i:fiAA$§f§far as
it reiata ta rejectien V flied by flue
$3&i’5150f3€f’S for i?¥fi;t?ii&’\3;;’5in§:;”%f*:;a:E§:§ev(§{V’3$.§Hn饒t§;e -0 passed
by the ninth fiaffiifiaers have sought
far 3 :i~é’ ;§«:v§1¥’§2{i3″r$pondent to aiiew the

app¥icatid’r3Afj6:f Empiezéciifig..f:§3&:’:;eiitia3ners, as campiainants

befcare fija with

grievance cf petétionars in this petition

*:%: é4t;.’rés¥$£:::§§fér&§s 1 and 2 being the members ef the

% rown%%5.suns¢&p$a Councii, Hunsur had fiiad a cmfipiaini ta

‘ i$.rI*_éi’:i€:aVfé«–.§actVi’e:/1 and iii} disquatify the respondent N@.3 to F

iéé Tifii fiififi C{)L3}§fl’ OF K.3§.RNA.’£’A.§CA AT EASHECEALURE W.I’.!’%{3.3§5 £314′ EEK???

EN TIEE E31331 C{}¥.}’R’§’ C33? §{AR}é1~’LTAKA AT BAN{.EALQR33 ¥’v’.?.}~3:3.2 45 GP’ 2&3?
9

prayer snught far by petitioners is premature i:*:_4.:..’g’.fg”s£t_:,’ts’.vg
arse? hence, interfarence by ihis Court B3 un::aiie’;;,t§’_:§’5:’:.:’b,j’::’: E .

6. in the light of the facts ar1g:3…c:ir;<j:ur'1'3éii:}if§§§*¢:~;*.v'-§V't::'V;.ffv'f§§ja.:
$359, as stated above, the writ pet:§ti:;fi;'_'fiiv;;dAb§.;
is dism£ss-zad as misc:onc:e'fved} .,,:.\:\\\. " 2 AA ' %
'F- Learned G:3ver:1;ff1eniV.i¥'-'%%§c3ér-»L_ its 1359
meme sf appearance er; fgfipgment wififin

three weeks ft't:;§'¥*3'«'§';(}ir_:$3y.::A_

8M\{*

3% 'E7H3£ fiiiifi CUURAE' U?' K.Al{3\éR'l33.KA. .231'? BANGALURE '~§.%"i'V§&§z3.2:15 UF EH39

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *